Efficient determination of global gravity field from satellite-to-satellite tracking mission

被引:34
|
作者
Han, SC [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn & Geodet Sci, Lab Space Geodesy & Remote Sensing Res, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
来源
关键词
GRACE mission; conjugate gradient; energy conservation principle; geopotential; satellite-to-satellite tracking;
D O I
10.1023/B:CELE.0000009383.07092.1f
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The gravity field dedicated satellite missions like CHAMP, GRACE, and GOCE are supposed to map the Earth's global gravity field with unprecedented accuracy and resolution. New models of the Earth's static and time-variable gravity fields will be available every month as one of the science products from GRACE. A method for the efficient gravity field recovery is presented using in situ satellite-to-satellite observations at altitude and results on static as well as temporal gravity field recovery are shown. Considering the energy relationship between the kinetic energy of the satellite and the gravitational potential, the disturbing potential observations can be computed from the orbital state vector, using high-low GPS tracking data, low - low satellite-to-satellite GRACE measurements, and data from 3-axis accelerometers. The solution method is based on the conjugate gradient iterative approach to efficiently recover the gravity field coefficients and approximate error covariance up to degree and order 120 every month. Based on the monthly GRACE noise-only simulation, the geoid was obtained with an accuracy of a few cm and with a resolution ( half wavelength) of 160 km. However, the geoid accuracy can become worse by a factor of 6 - 7 because of spatial aliasing. The approximate error covariance was found to be a very good accuracy measure of the estimated coefficients, geoid, and gravity anomaly. The temporal gravity field, representing the monthly mean continental water mass redistribution, was recovered in the presence of measurement noise and high frequency temporal variation. The resulting recovered temporal gravity fields have about 0.3 mm errors in terms of geoid height with a resolution of 670 km.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 102
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficient Determination of Global Gravity Field from Satellite-to-satellite Tracking Mission
    Shin-Chan Han
    [J]. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2004, 88 : 69 - 102
  • [2] GRAVITY ESTIMATION FROM STAGE, A SATELLITE-TO-SATELLITE TRACKING MISSION
    JEKELI, C
    UPADHYAY, TN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH AND PLANETS, 1990, 95 (B7): : 10973 - 10985
  • [3] Global lunar gravity recovery from satellite-to-satellite tracking
    Floberghagen, R
    Noomen, R
    Visser, PNAM
    Racca, GD
    [J]. PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 1996, 44 (10) : 1081 - 1097
  • [4] Analysis of the gravity field recovery accuracy from the low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking mission
    Ran Jiang-Jun
    Zhong Min
    Xu Hou-Ze
    Zhou Ze-Bing
    Wan Xiao-Yun
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2015, 58 (10): : 3487 - 3495
  • [5] THE GRAVITY-FIELD IN THE CENTRAL PACIFIC FROM SATELLITE-TO-SATELLITE TRACKING
    MARSH, JG
    MARSH, BD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1981, 86 (NB5): : 3979 - 3997
  • [6] PROBING EARTHS GRAVITY FIELD BY MEANS OF SATELLITE-TO-SATELLITE TRACKING
    VONBUN, FO
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 1977, 284 (1326): : 475 - 483
  • [7] Satellite-to-satellite tracking and satellite gravity gradiometry (Advanced techniques for high-resolution geopotential field determination)
    Willi Freeden
    Volker Michel
    Helga Nutz
    [J]. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 2002, 43 : 19 - 56
  • [8] DETERMINATION OF THE GEOPOTENTIAL FROM SATELLITE-TO-SATELLITE TRACKING DATA
    DOUGLAS, BC
    GOAD, CC
    MORRISON, FF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1980, 85 (NB10): : 5471 - 5480
  • [9] Satellite-to-satellite tracking and satellite gravity gradiometry (Advanced techniques for high-resolution geopotential field determination)
    Freeden, W
    Michel, V
    Nutz, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS, 2002, 43 (01) : 19 - 56
  • [10] On the determination of geopotential differences from satellite-to-satellite tracking
    Jekeli, C
    [J]. IV HOTINE-MARUSSI SYMPOSIUM ON MATHEMATICAL GEODESY, 2001, (122): : 33 - 39