Uptake of angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension

被引:4
|
作者
Greving, JP
Denig, P
van der Veen, WJ
Beltman, FW
Sturkenboom, MCJM
de Zeeuw, D
Haaijer-Ruskamp, FM
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Clin Pharmacol, NL-9700 AD Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Gen Practice, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Med Informat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00228-005-0924-7
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine trends in prescribing of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) as initial and second-line treatment of hypertension. Methods: We performed a cohort study in the Integrated Primary Care Information database, a general practice research database in The Netherlands. We included hypertensive patients who were newly treated with antihypertensive drugs between 1996 and 1999. Initial treatment was defined as the first prescribed antihypertensive drug after diagnosis of hypertension. As second-line treatment, we considered prescriptions of a second antihypertensive drug class, either as switch or addition. We used logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analysis to estimate time trends in use of ARBs as initial or second-line treatment. Results: In total, 8% of the 3,102 newly treated hypertensive patients received ARBs as initial treatment. Initial ARB use increased significantly from 4% to 10% during the period 1996-1999, whereas calcium channel blocker and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-1) use decreased. ARBs were used as second-line treatment in less than 4% of 2,544 patients who were initially treated with an antihypertensive drug other than an ARB: 2% switched to an ARB (mostly from ACE-1s) and 1% received ARBs as add-on treatment. Diuretics and beta-blockers were used five to ten times more often as add-on treatment than ARBs. Conclusion: ARBs achieved a position in the treatment of hypertension as initial rather than second-line therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 466
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uptake of angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension
    Jacoba P. Greving
    Petra Denig
    Willem Jan van der Veen
    Frank W. Beltman
    Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom
    Dick de Zeeuw
    Flora M. Haaijer-Ruskamp
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2005, 61 : 461 - 466
  • [2] Uptake of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in the treatment of hypertension
    Greving, JP
    Denig, P
    van der Veen, WJ
    Beltman, FW
    de Zeeuw, D
    Sturkenboom, MCJM
    Haaijer-Ruskamp, FM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 59 (05) : 611 - 611
  • [3] Economic evaluation of four angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension
    Miller, Lesley-Ann
    Wade, Rolin
    Dai, Dingwei
    Cziraky, Mark J.
    Ramaswamy, Krishnan
    Panjabi, Sumeet
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2010, 26 (06) : 1307 - 1320
  • [4] The place of Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB's) in the treatment of Hypertension
    不详
    [J]. SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 94 (02): : 104 - 105
  • [5] Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in the Treatment of Hypertension
    Benenson, Irina
    [J]. JNP- THE JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2022, 18 (05): : 586 - 587
  • [6] Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for the Treatment of Hypertension in Children
    Rocchini, Albert P.
    [J]. CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2011, 50 (09) : 791 - 796
  • [7] Treatment of arterial hypertension with angiotensin receptor blockers
    Wink, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL FUR HYPERTONIE, 2007, 11 (02): : 7 - 11
  • [8] Angiotensin II receptor blockers in hypertension and renal disease
    Bakris, GL
    [J]. HOSPITAL PRACTICE, 1998, 33 (04) : 19 - +
  • [9] Hypertension - Update on use of angiotensin II receptor blockers
    Jacobson, EJ
    [J]. GERIATRICS-US, 2001, 56 (02): : 20 - +
  • [10] Update on the efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers in treatment of hypertension
    不详
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2005, 11 (13): : S386 - S391