Causes of industrial land-use regulations in China: A share tenancy perspective

被引:3
|
作者
Gao, Fugang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ma, Xianlei [1 ,2 ]
van der Krabben, Erwin [4 ]
Ploegmakers, Huub [4 ]
Shi, Xiaoping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, China Acad Resources Environm & Dev, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Publ Adm, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China
[3] Southeast Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, NL-6525 AJ Nijmegen, Netherlands
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Industrial land-use regulation; Share tenancy; Land scarcity; Firm characteristics; State-owned land; LOCAL-GOVERNMENTS; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; POLICY; COMPETITION; INCENTIVES; CONTRACTS; ECONOMICS; SUBSIDIES; PRICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106374
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Industrial land-use regulations (ILURs) are important policy instruments used by local governments in China to remedy the side effects of industrial production and to protect scarce land. In recent years, this type of policy has become increasingly stringent. To explain the reasons for using them, we propose an analytical framework in which ILURs are integrated into a land-leasing contract between the firm and the local government. This contract is theorized as a share tenancy with an exogenous rental percentage, and the stringency of ILURs is chosen to minimize transaction costs. In this setting, the region with a higher scarcity of industrial land or higher rede-velopment costs of stock industrial land is supposed to impose a shorter leasing term and tighter control of firms' inputs and outputs (FIOs); meanwhile, firms with higher anticipated productivity will be offered a longer leasing term. These propositions are consistent with the patterns we reveal by analyzing the regulatory policies of three Chinese cities around 2015 and the detailed regulations and default clauses stipulated industrial land-leasing contracts in 2017 in Shanghai.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DISCRIMINATORY LAND-USE REGULATIONS
    TOMSON, B
    COPLAN, N
    [J]. PROGRESSIVE ARCHITECTURE, 1975, 56 (08): : 74 - 74
  • [2] The general land-use planning in China: an uncertainty perspective
    Wei, Xiaofei
    Wei, Chaofu
    Cao, Xiaoteng
    Li, Bing
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2016, 43 (02): : 361 - 380
  • [3] Introduction: Exclusionary land-use regulations
    Ihlanfeldt, KR
    [J]. URBAN STUDIES, 2004, 41 (02) : 255 - 259
  • [4] Modeling and simulating industrial land-use evolution in Shanghai, China
    Qiu, Rongxu
    Xu, Wei
    Zhang, John
    Staenz, Karl
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 20 (01) : 57 - 83
  • [5] Evaluating land-use suitability of an industrial city in northeast China
    Dai, Limin
    Zhao, Xiaofan
    He, Hong S.
    Deng, Hongbing
    Yu, Dapao
    Zhou, Li
    Wu, Shengnan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2008, 15 (04): : 378 - 382
  • [6] Modeling and simulating industrial land-use evolution in Shanghai, China
    Rongxu Qiu
    Wei Xu
    John Zhang
    Karl Staenz
    [J]. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2018, 20 : 57 - 83
  • [7] INDUSTRIAL LAND-USE IN DELHI
    GUPTE, CS
    MATHUR, KK
    SINGH, M
    GUPTA, SC
    RAM, M
    BHATIA, MB
    [J]. EKISTICS-THE PROBLEMS AND SCIENCE OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS, 1976, 41 (244): : 158 - 159
  • [8] Land-use regulations in the eminent domain process
    Dahlstrom, WS
    [J]. URBAN LAWYER, 1999, 31 (03): : 569 - 590
  • [9] DISCRIMINATORY LAND-USE REGULATIONS .2.
    TOMSON, B
    COPLAN, N
    [J]. PROGRESSIVE ARCHITECTURE, 1975, 56 (09): : 98 - 98
  • [10] PUBLIC LAND-USE REGULATIONS AND MARKETABILITY OF TITLE
    STEPHAN, GP
    [J]. WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW, 1958, (01) : 128 - 149