Mars sample return mission architectures utilizing low thrust propulsion

被引:6
|
作者
Derz, Uwe [1 ]
Seboldt, Wolfgang [1 ]
机构
[1] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Space Syst, D-51147 Cologne, Germany
关键词
Mars sample return; Low thrust electric propulsion;
D O I
10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.03.017
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The Mars sample return mission is a flagship mission within ESA's Aurora program and envisioned to take place in the timeframe of 2020-2025. Previous studies developed a mission architecture consisting of two elements, an orbiter and a lander, each utilizing chemical propulsion and a heavy launcher like Ariane 5 ECA. The lander transports an ascent vehicle to the surface of Mars. The orbiter performs a separate impulsive transfer to Mars, conducts a rendezvous in Mars orbit with the sample container, delivered by the ascent vehicle, and returns the samples back to Earth in a small Earth entry capsule. Because the launch of the heavy orbiter by Ariane 5 ECA makes an Earth swing by mandatory for the trans-Mars injection, its total mission time amounts to about 1460 days. The present study takes a fresh look at the subject and conducts a more general mission and system analysis of the space transportation elements including electric propulsion for the transfer. Therefore, detailed spacecraft models for orbiters, landers and ascent vehicles are developed. Based on that, trajectory calculations and optimizations of interplanetary transfers, Mars entries, descents and landings as well as Mars ascents are carried out. The results of the system analysis identified electric propulsion for the orbiter as most beneficial in terms of launch mass, leading to a reduction of launch vehicle requirements and enabling a launch by a Soyuz-Fregat into GTO. Such a sample return mission could be conducted within 1150-1250 days. Concerning the lander, a separate launch in combination with electric propulsion leads to a significant reduction of launch vehicle requirements, but also requires a large number of engines and correspondingly a large power system. Therefore, a lander performing a separate chemical transfer could possibly be more advantageous. Alternatively, a second possible mission architecture has been developed, requiring only one heavy launch vehicle (e.g., Proton). In that case the lander is transported piggyback by the electrically propelled orbiter. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 96
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mars Sample Return Mission: Mars Ascent Vehicle Propulsion Design
    Sopegno, Laura
    Valavanis, Kimon P.
    Rutherford, Matthew J.
    Casalino, Lorenzo
    [J]. 2020 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE (AEROCONF 2020), 2020,
  • [2] Trade Space Evaluation of Ascent and Return Architectures for a Mars Sample Return Mission
    Alibay, Farah
    Bailey, Zachary J.
    [J]. 2014 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2014,
  • [3] Mars Sample Return: The design of low risk architectures
    Sutter, B
    McGee, M
    [J]. 2002 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-7, 2002, : 537 - 548
  • [4] LOW ENERGY ESCAPE TRAJECTORY FOR THE MARS MOON SAMPLE RETURN MISSION
    Horikawa, Makoto
    Kawakatsu, Yasuhiro
    Yoshimura, Hiroaki
    [J]. SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2016, PTS I-IV, 2016, 158 : 1479 - 1488
  • [5] The CanMars Mars Sample Return analogue mission
    Osinski, Gordon R.
    Battler, Melissa
    Caudill, Christy M.
    Francis, Raymond
    Haltigin, Timothy
    Hipkin, Victoria J.
    Kerrigan, Mary
    Pilles, Eric A.
    Pontefract, Alexandra
    Tornabene, Livio L.
    Allard, Pierre
    Bakambu, Joseph N.
    Balachandran, Katiyayni
    Beaty, David W.
    Bednar, Daniel
    Bina, Arya
    Bourassa, Matthew
    Cao, Fenge
    Christoffersen, Peter
    Choe, Byung-Hun
    Cloutis, Edward
    Cote, Kristen
    Cross, Matthew
    D'Aoust, Bianca
    Draz, Omar
    Dudley, Bryce
    Duff, Shamus
    Dzamba, Tom
    Fulford, Paul
    Godin, Etienne
    Goordial, Jackie
    Galofre, Anna Grau
    Haid, Taylor
    Harrington, Elise
    Harrison, Tanya
    Hawkswell, Jordan
    Hickson, Dylan
    Hill, Patrick
    Innis, Liam
    King, Derek
    Kissi, Jonathan
    Laughton, Joshua
    Li, Yaozhu
    Lymer, Elizabeth
    Maggiori, Catherine
    Maloney, Matthew
    Marion, Cassandra L.
    Maris, John
    Mcfadden, Sarah
    McLennan, Scott M.
    [J]. PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2019, 166 : 110 - 130
  • [6] MARS ROVER SAMPLE RETURN MISSION DEFINITION
    FRIEDLANDER, AL
    [J]. CASE FOR MARS 111 : STRATEGIES FOR EXPLORATION - TECHNICAL, 1989, 75 : 227 - 234
  • [7] Mars Sample Return: Architecture and mission design
    Sherwood, B
    Smith, DB
    Greeley, R
    Whittaker, WR
    Woodcock, GR
    Barton, G
    Pearson, DW
    Siegfried, W
    [J]. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2003, 53 (4-10) : 353 - 364
  • [8] Mars Sample Return Mission Concept Status
    Muirhead, Brian K.
    Nicholas, Austin
    Umland, Jeff
    [J]. 2020 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE (AEROCONF 2020), 2020,
  • [9] Mars Sample Return: Architecture and mission design
    Sherwood, B
    [J]. 2002 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-7, 2002, : 523 - 536
  • [10] MARS ROVER AND SAMPLE RETURN MISSION DESIGN
    KWOK, JH
    FRIEDLANDER, AL
    [J]. ORBITAL MECHANICS AND MISSION DESIGN, 1989, 69 : 609 - 623