Born to Win: Reproductive Health Policy and Urban Education Returns in China

被引:0
|
作者
Gao, Qing [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Xiu-Xiu [3 ]
Yan, Wei-Lan [3 ]
Wang, Ai-Hua [4 ]
Zhang, Wei-Hua [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Nanning Normal Univ, Key Lab Environm Change & Resources Use Beibu Gul, Minist Educ, Nanning, Peoples R China
[2] Nanning Normal Univ, Grad Sch, Nanning, Peoples R China
[3] Nanning Normal Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Nanning, Peoples R China
[4] Guangxi Univ Foreign Languages, Sch Int Econ & Trade, Nanning, Peoples R China
[5] Guangxi Univ, Sch Econ, Nanning, Peoples R China
[6] Guangxi Dev & Reform Commiss, Nanning, Peoples R China
关键词
born to win; residents' reproductive health policy; regression discontinuity model; return on education; intermediary effect; ECONOMIC RETURN; INCOME;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.807794
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This study explores the relationship between China's reproductive health policy and the rate of return on urban education by using fixed-effect, mediating-effect, and breakpoint regression models. The authors study the impact of China's reproductive health policy on individual years of education, income, return on education, the impact of reproductive health policy on population health, and overall human development. The empirical results show that the implementation of China's reproductive health policy can improve the rate of return on urban education and increase the average length of education of urban residents by 0.29 years. Under the breakpoint regression model, the educational return rate of urban residents is approximately 12.2% higher than the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimate. China's reproductive health policy has significantly promoted the return rate of residents' education and simultaneously effectively promoted the income of urban residents. With the development of the economy, the government should properly adjust reproductive health policies and improve the population health rate so that the adjustment of reproductive health policies can comprehensively promote the health of residents of all ages. The overall relaxation of family restrictions on children's human capital investment will likely reduce the negative impact of the overall relaxation of family planning, not only improving the health of the population but also contributing to sustainable economic development.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Private returns to education in urban China
    Qiu T.
    Hudson J.
    [J]. Economic Change and Restructuring, 2010, 43 (2) : 131 - 150
  • [2] Heterogeneous Returns to University Education in Urban China
    Zhao, Xiliang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT ICPEM 2009, VOL 1: SOCIAL ISSUES AND ECONOMIC POLICIES, 2009, : 434 - 437
  • [3] Estimating returns to education using twins in urban China
    Li, Hongbin
    Liu, Pak Wai
    Zhang, Junsen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2012, 97 (02) : 494 - 504
  • [4] Increasing heterogeneity in the economic returns to higher education in urban China
    Hu, Anning
    Hibel, Jacob
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2015, 52 (03): : 322 - 330
  • [5] Private returns to investment in education: an empirical study of urban China
    Qian, Xiaolei
    Smyth, Russell
    [J]. POST-COMMUNIST ECONOMIES, 2008, 20 (04) : 483 - 501
  • [6] RETURNS TO EDUCATION IN CHINA
    BYRON, RP
    MANALOTO, EQ
    [J]. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 1990, 38 (04) : 783 - 796
  • [7] Earnings returns to tertiary education in urban China, 1988-2008*
    Ye, Hua
    [J]. CHINESE SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2021, 53 (04) : 359 - 381
  • [8] Does the market pay off? Earnings returns to education in urban China
    Wu, XG
    Xie, Y
    [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2003, 68 (03) : 425 - 442
  • [9] Why Are Returns to Education Higher for Women than for Men in Urban China?
    Hannum, Emily
    Zhang, Yuping
    Wang, Meiyan
    [J]. CHINA QUARTERLY, 2013, (215): : 616 - 640
  • [10] Tax policy and returns to education
    Booth, A. L.
    Coles, M. G.
    [J]. LABOUR ECONOMICS, 2010, 17 (01) : 291 - 301