A DEA-based approach for allocation of emission reduction tasks

被引:32
|
作者
Wu, Jie [1 ]
Zhu, Qingyuan [1 ]
Chu, Junfei [1 ]
An, Qingxian [2 ]
Liang, Liang [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] Cent S Univ, Sch Business, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hefei, Peoples R China
基金
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金;
关键词
data envelopment analysis; game theory; environment; decision theory; emission permits; satisfaction degree; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION; SHARED COSTS; FIXED COST; PERMITS; EFFICIENCY; TECHNOLOGY; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2016.1194537
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Rapid economic growth has led to increasing pollution emission, leading governments to require emission reductions by specific amounts. The allocation of specific emission reduction tasks has become a significant issue and has drawn the attention of academia. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been extended to construct the allocation of emission reduction tasks model. These previous DEA-based approaches have strong assumptions about individual enterprise production. In this paper, we propose a new method to accurately assess the production, using each enterprise's previously observed production to construct its own production technology plan. With emission permits decreased, the enterprise can have new production strategy based on its own technology. Assuming emission permits can be freely bought and sold, we show how each enterprise can determine the optimal amount of emission allowance that should be used for production, which may leave some allowance to be sold for extra profit or may require the purchase of permits from other firms. Considering the limitation on the total allowance from emission permits, we introduce the concept of satisfaction degree and use it in maximising the minimum enterprise satisfaction degree. Last, a numerical example is presented and an empirical application is given to verify the proposed approach.
引用
收藏
页码:5618 / 5633
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A DEA-based approach for fair reduction and reallocation of emission permits
    Wu, Huaqing
    Du, Shaofu
    Liang, Liang
    Zhou, Yafang
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2013, 58 (5-6) : 1095 - 1101
  • [2] A DEA-Based Approach for Equitable Allocation of Fixed Cost
    Lin, Ruiyue
    Chen, Xiaomin
    [J]. CONFERENCE ON WEB BASED BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-2, 2010, : 1255 - 1258
  • [3] Production planning: a DEA-based approach
    Amirteimoori, Alireza
    Kordrostami, Sohrab
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 56 (1-4): : 369 - 376
  • [4] Production planning: a DEA-based approach
    Alireza Amirteimoori
    Sohrab Kordrostami
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 56 : 369 - 376
  • [5] DEA-based centralized resource allocation with network flows
    Tao, Xiangyang
    Xiong, Beibei
    An, Qingxian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (02) : 926 - 958
  • [6] A DEA-based decision framework to determine the subsidy rate of emission reduction for local government
    Xia, Qiong
    Jin, Minyue
    Wu, Huaqing
    Yang, Chenchen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 202 : 846 - 852
  • [7] Regional emission reduction target allocation based on improved DEA
    Zhou R.
    Wang X.
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (4)
  • [8] An extended transportation problem: a DEA-based approach
    Alireza Amirteimoori
    [J]. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2011, 19 : 513 - 521
  • [9] A DEA-based approach to customer value analysis
    Cherchye, Laurens
    De Rock, Bram
    Dierynck, Bart
    Kerstens, Pieter Jan
    Roodhooft, Filip
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 308 (03) : 1319 - 1331
  • [10] The Evaluation of Green Manufacturing: A DEA-Based Approach
    Fan, Mei-Niang
    Leu, Jun-Der
    Krischke, Andre
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2016, : 65 - 69