Varieties of coal-fired power phase-out across Europe

被引:90
|
作者
Rentier, Gerrit [1 ]
Lelieveldt, Herman [1 ]
Kramer, Gert Jan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Univ Coll Roosevelt, Dept Social Sci, Lange Noordstr 1, Middelburg, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Princetonlaan 8a, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Energy transition; Coal; Carbon lock-in; Institutional lock-in; ENERGY TRANSITIONS; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; CAPITALISM; SUBSIDIES; EMISSIONS; INDUSTRY; GERMANY; HISTORY; SECTOR; UNION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.042
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Meeting climate goals is a particular challenge for countries that combine extensive use of coal as a fuel for power generation with a significant history of coal mining. We argue that these countries are prone to institutional carbon lock-in processes that significantly affect the phase-out of the use of coal. We use the analytical framework of Varieties of Capitalism to compare degrees of carbon lock-in in Coordinated Market Economies (CMEs) with Liberal Market Economies (LMEs). In CMEs "strategic interaction", "employment protection" and "government ownership" translate into protection of uncompetitive domestic coal activities and assets through (cross) subsidies and veto play. In LMEs the use of coal will be more dependent upon its market price in the international energy market. Through a qualitative comparison of the development of coal-mining and coal-fired electricity generation in three CMEs (Germany, Spain, Poland) and one LME (the UK) over the period between 1990 and 2017 we show that the UK's liberal market economy facilitated a relatively swift phasing out of coal mining and the use of coal, compared to a much more reluctant transition in the other three countries.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 632
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrated assessment of a phase-out of coal-fired power plants in Germany
    Heinrichs, Heidi Ursula
    Schumann, Diana
    Voegele, Stefan
    Biss, Klaus Hendrik
    Shamon, Hawal
    Markewitz, Peter
    Toebben, Johannes
    Gillessen, Bastian
    Gotzens, Fabian
    Ernst, Anna
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 126 : 285 - 305
  • [2] Framing low-carbon pathways: A discursive analysis of contending storylines surrounding the phase-out of coal-fired power in Ontario
    Rosenbloom, Daniel
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2018, 27 : 129 - 145
  • [3] Doctors call to phase out coal-fired electricity
    Sibbald, Barbara
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2016, 188 (17-18) : E423 - E424
  • [4] Lights going out on Australia's coal-fired power
    Miller, Claire
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 16 (01) : 4 - 4
  • [5] NC UTILITY TO PHASE OUT UNSCRUBBED COAL-FIRED PLANTS
    Hutchinson, Harry
    [J]. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 132 (01) : 10 - 11
  • [6] Coal-Fired Power Plants
    Peter Pauls
    [J]. 热力透平, 2004, (02) : 105 - 107
  • [7] Coal-fired power materials
    Viswanathan, Vis
    Purgert, Robert
    Rawls, Patricia
    [J]. ADVANCED MATERIALS & PROCESSES, 2008, 166 (08): : 47 - 49
  • [8] MAGENTOHYDRODYNAMICS AND COAL-FIRED POWER
    BORMAN, S
    [J]. CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 1991, 69 (24) : 35 - 35
  • [9] Unilateral Phase-Out of Coal to Power in an Emissions Trading Scheme
    Eichner, Thomas
    Pethig, Ruediger
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2021, 80 (02): : 379 - 407
  • [10] U.S. Coal-Fired Power Development: Down but Not Out
    Burt, Britt
    Mullins, Shane
    [J]. POWER, 2010, 154 (10) : 82 - +