Disaster resilience as a complex problem: Why linearity is not applicable for long-term recovery

被引:52
|
作者
Blackman, Deborah [1 ]
Nakanishi, Hitomi [2 ]
Benson, Angela M. [1 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Canberra, Sch Business, POB 7916, Canberra Bc, ACT 2610, Australia
[2] Univ Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Change management; Social capital; Disaster resilience; Volunteering; Disaster recovery; CRISIS MANAGEMENT; COMMUNITY; EARTHQUAKE; MITIGATION; LEADERSHIP; FRAMEWORK; RISK; KEY;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper proposes that a reason why long-term disaster initiatives fail is the adoption of a linear, complicated problem based approach rather than seeing recovery as a complex system. The argument is that initial post disaster responses are complicated with a subsequent transition to a complex problem. Transition is proffered as a missing link between short-term responses (rescue and relief) and long-term disaster recovery. Case data from Japan and Christchurch suggests that three system elements influencing potential transition are: the actors and their purpose; new forms of social capital and a move to greater co-production with community. Influencing these effectively will support enhanced traction to achieve the move to long-term recovery. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 98
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条