Interseason variability of a functional movement test, the 9+screening battery, in professional male football players

被引:12
|
作者
Bakken, A. [1 ,2 ]
Targett, S. [1 ]
Bere, T. [1 ,2 ]
Eirale, C. [1 ]
Farooq, A. [1 ]
Tol, J. L. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Whiteley, R. [1 ]
Witvrouw, E. [5 ]
Khan, K. M. [6 ]
Bahr, R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aspetar Orthopaed & Sports Med Hosp, Doha, Qatar
[2] Norwegian Sch Sport Sci, Oslo Sports Trauma Res Ctr, Oslo, Norway
[3] OLVG, Sports Phys Grp, Dept Sports Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Acad Med Ctr, Acad Ctr Evidence Based Sports Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Ghent, Dept Rehabil Sci & Physiotherapy, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Ghent, Belgium
[6] Univ British Columbia, Ctr Mobil & Hip Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE TESTS; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; TEST-RETEST; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; INJURY; SCREEN; AGREEMENT; SCORES;
D O I
10.1136/bjsports-2016-096570
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background The Nine Plus screening battery test (9+) is a functional movement test intended to identify limitations in fundamental movement patterns predisposing athletes to injury. However, the interseason variability is unknown. Aim To examine the variability of the 9+ test between 2 consecutive seasons in professional male football players. Methods Asymptomatic Qatar Star League players (n= 220) completed the 9+ at the beginning of the 2013 and 2014 seasons. Time-loss injuries in training and matches were obtained from the Aspetar Injury and Illness Surveillance Program. No intervention was initiated between test occasions. Results A significant increase in the mean total score of 1.6 points (95% CI 1.0 to 2.2, p<0.001) was found from season 1 (22.2 +/- 4.1 (SD)) to season 2 (23.8 +/- 3.3). The variability was large, as shown by an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.24 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.36) and a minimal detectable change (MDC) of 8.7 points. Of the 220 players, 136 (61.8%) suffered a timeloss injury between the 2 tests. There was an improvement in mean total scores in the injured (+ 2.0 +/- 0.4 (SE), p< 0.001) group but not in the uninjured group (+ 0.9 +/- 0.5, p=0.089). The variability from season 1 to season 2 was large both in the injured (ICC 0.25, 0.09 to 0.40, MDC 8.3) and uninjured (ICC 0.24, 0.02 to 0.43, MDC 9.1) groups. Conclusions The 9+ demonstrated substantial intraindividual variability in the total score between 2 consecutive seasons, irrespective of injury. A change above 8 points is necessary to represent a real change in the 9+ test between seasons.
引用
收藏
页码:1081 / 1086
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] The functional movement test 9+is a poor screening test for lower extremity injuries in professional male football players: a 2-year prospective cohort study
    Bakken, Arnhild
    Targett, Stephen
    Bere, Tone
    Eirale, Cristiano
    Farooq, Abdulaziz
    Tol, Johannes L.
    Whiteley, Rod
    Khan, Karim M.
    Bahr, Roald
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 52 (16) : 1047 - +
  • [2] The 9+screening test score does not predict injuries in elite floorball players
    Tervo, Taru
    Ermling, Jenny
    Nordstrom, Anna
    Toss, Fredrik
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2020, 30 (07) : 1232 - 1236
  • [3] Quality of functional movement patterns and injury examination in elite-level male professional football players
    Zalai, D.
    Panics, G.
    Bobak, P.
    Csaki, I.
    Hamar, P.
    [J]. ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA HUNGARICA, 2015, 102 (01) : 34 - 42
  • [4] Functional movement test scores improve following a standardized off-season intervention program in professional football players
    Kiesel, K.
    Plisky, P.
    Butler, R.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2011, 21 (02) : 287 - 292
  • [5] Locomotor Demands in Professional Male Football Players: Differences and Variability According to Halves and Playing Positions
    Akyildiz, Zeki
    Yuksel, Yilmaz
    Cene, Erhan
    Parim, Coskun
    Silva, Rui Miguel
    Isik, Anil
    Yildiz, Mehmet
    Silva, Ana Filipa
    Badicu, Georgian
    Clemente, Filipe Manuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2022, 18 (07)
  • [6] Asymmetry during Functional Movement Screening and injury risk in junior football players: A replication study
    Chalmers, S.
    Debenedictis, T. A.
    Zacharia, A.
    Townsley, S.
    Gleeson, C.
    Lynagh, M.
    Townsley, A.
    Fuller, J. T.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2018, 28 (03) : 1281 - 1287
  • [7] Pilot Study: The Relationship between Foot Posture and Movement Quality in Non-Professional Male Football Players
    Algaba-Del-Castillo, Jose
    Castro-Mendez, Aurora
    Perez-Belloso, Ana Juana
    Garrido-Barragan, Jose Gabriel
    Sanchez, Alberto Aguilar
    Cohena-Jimenez, Manuel
    [J]. LIFE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [8] Functional movement screen test: A reliable screening test for young elite ice hockey players
    Parenteau-G, Elizabeth
    Gaudreault, Nathaly
    Chambers, Stephane
    Boisvert, Caroline
    Grenier, Alexandre
    Gagne, Genevieve
    Balg, Frederic
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2014, 15 (03) : 169 - 175
  • [9] Validation of a Modified Functional Movement Screen Test for Division III Male Soccer Players
    Ifonlaja, Jide
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (05): : 443 - 444
  • [10] Functional movement screen and Y-Balance test scores across levels of American football players
    Lisman, Peter
    Nadelen, Mary
    Hildebrand, Emily
    Leppert, Kyle
    de la Motte, Sarah
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF SPORT, 2018, 35 (03) : 253 - 260