Head injuries: a study evaluating the impact of the NICE head injury guidelines

被引:40
|
作者
Hassan, Z
Smith, M
Littlewood, S
Bouamra, O
Hughes, D
Biggin, C
Amos, K
Mendelow, AD
Lecky, F
机构
[1] Hope Hosp Salford, Manchester M41 5HA, Lancs, England
[2] Newcastle Gen Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/emj.2004.021717
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: The NICE head injury guidelines recommend a different approach in the management of head injury patients. It suggests that CT head scan should replace skull x ray (SXR) and observation/ admission as the first investigation. We wished to determine the impact of NICE on SXR, CT scan, and admission on all patients with head injury presenting to the ED setting and estimate the cost effectiveness of these guidelines, which has not been quantified to date. Design: Study of head injury patients presenting to two EDs before and after implementation of NICE guidelines Methods: The rate of SXR, CT scan, and admission were determined six months before and one month after NICE implementation in both centres. The before study also looked at predicted rates had NICE been applied. This enabled predicted and actual cost effectiveness to be determined. Result: 1130 patients with head injury were studied in four 1 month periods (two in each centre). At the teaching hospital, the CT head scan rate more than doubled (3% to 7%), the SXR declined (37% to 4%), while the admission rate more than halved (9% to 4%). This represented a saving of 3381 pound per 100 head injury patients: greater than predicted with no adverse events. At the District General Hospital, the CT head scan rate more than quadrupled (1.4% to 9%), the SXR dropped (19 to 0.57%), while the admission rate declined (7% to 5%). This represented a saving of 290 pound per 100 head injury patients: less than predicted. Conclusion: The implementation of the NICE guidelines led to a two to fivefold increase in the CT head scan rate depending on the cases and baseline departmental practice. However, the reduction in SXR and admission appears to more than offset these costs without compromising patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 849
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NICE head injury guidelines
    Coats, TJ
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2004, 21 (04) : 402 - 402
  • [2] The NICE head injury guidelines
    Yates, DW
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2003, 20 (02) : 117 - 117
  • [3] The impact of NICE guidelines for the management of head injury on the workload of the radiology department
    Shravat, BP
    Hynes, KA
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2004, 21 (04) : 521 - 522
  • [4] NICE guidelines for the management of acute head injury
    Halliwell, O
    Jackson, E
    Cove, R
    King, M
    Gawne-Cain, M
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 60 (12) : 1311 - 1311
  • [5] NICE head injury guidelines: review of the legal mandate
    Baines, P
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2005, 22 (10) : 706 - 709
  • [6] Are we ready for NICE head injury guidelines in Scotland?
    Swann, IJ
    Kelliher, T
    Kerr, J
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2004, 21 (04) : 401 - 402
  • [7] Are we able to comply with the NICE head injury guidelines?
    Qureshi, AA
    Mulleady, V
    Patel, A
    Porter, KM
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2005, 22 (12) : 861 - 862
  • [8] NICE guidelines for the management of acute head injury, 2003
    Adair, W
    Britton, I
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 60 (03) : 410 - 410
  • [9] Brain Injury Guidelines for Small Head Injuries
    Velmahos, George C.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2015, 150 (09) : 872 - 873
  • [10] NICE guidelines for the investigation of head injuries-an anticoagulant loop hole?
    Prowse, Simon J.
    Sloan, John
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2010, 27 (04) : 277 - 278