Clinically significant changes in pain along the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale in patients with chronic low back pain

被引:83
|
作者
Suzuki, Hidenori [1 ,2 ]
Aono, Shuichi [3 ,4 ]
Inoue, Shinsuke [3 ]
Imajo, Yasuaki [1 ]
Nishida, Norihiro [1 ]
Funaba, Masahiro [1 ]
Harada, Hidenori [2 ,5 ]
Mori, Aki [2 ,5 ]
Matsumoto, Mishiya [2 ,5 ]
Higuchi, Fumihiro [2 ,6 ]
Nakagawa, Shin [2 ,6 ]
Tahara, Shu [2 ,7 ]
Ikeda, Satoshi [2 ,7 ]
Izumi, Hironori [2 ,7 ]
Taguchi, Toshihiko [8 ]
Ushida, Takahiro [3 ]
Sakai, Takashi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yamaguchi Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Grad Sch Med, Yamaguchi, Japan
[2] Yamaguchi Univ, Pain Management Res Inst, Yamaguchi, Japan
[3] Aichi Med Univ, Multidisciplinary Pain Ctr, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
[4] Aichi Med Univ, Dept Pain Data Management, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
[5] Yamaguchi Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Grad Sch Med, Yamaguchi, Japan
[6] Yamaguchi Univ, Dept Psychiat, Grad Sch Med, Yamaguchi, Japan
[7] Yamaguchi Univ, Dept Rehabil, Yamaguchi, Japan
[8] Yamaguchi Rosai Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Yamaguchi, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 03期
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; MEANINGFUL CHANGE; HEALTH-STATUS; QUESTIONNAIRE; OUTCOMES; VALIDATION; DISABILITY; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0229228
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Low back pain (LBP) is the most common cause of chronic pain. Numerous clinical scales are available for evaluating pain, but their objective criteria in the management of LBP patients remain unclear. This study aimed to determine an objective cutoff value for a change in the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (Delta PI-NRS) three months after LBP treatment. Its utility was compared with changes in six commonly used clinical scales in LBP patients: Pain Disability Assessment Scale (PDAS), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEC), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), EuroQoL 5 Dimension (EQ5D), and Locomo 25. We included 161 LBP patients treated in two representative pain management centers. Patients were partitioned into two groups based on patient's global impression of change (PGIC) three months after treatment: satisfied (PGIC = 1, 2) and unsatisfied (3-7). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to explore relevant scales in distinguishing the two groups. We found Delta PI-NRS to be most closely associated with PGIC status regardless of pre-treatment pain intensity, followed by Delta EQ5D, Delta PDAS, Delta PSEC, and Delta PCS. The Delta PI-NRS cutoff value for distinguishing the PGIC status was determined by ROC analysis to be 1.3-1.8 depending on pre-treatment PI-NRS, which was rounded up to Delta PI-NRS = 2 for general use. Spearman's correlation coefficient revealed close relationships between Delta PI- NRS and the six other clinical scales. Therefore, we determined cutoff values of these scales in distinguishing the status of Delta PI-NRS >= 2 vs. Delta PI-NRS<2 to be as follows: Delta PDAS, 6.71; Delta PSEC, 6.48; Delta PCS, 6.48; Delta AIS, 1.91; Delta EQ5D, 0.08; and Delta Locomo 25, 9.31. These can be used as definitive indicator of therapeutic outcome in the management of chronic LBP patients.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale
    Salaffi, F
    Stancati, A
    Silvestri, CA
    Ciapetti, A
    Grassi, W
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2004, 8 (04) : 283 - 291
  • [2] Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain
    Childs, JD
    Piva, SR
    Fritz, JM
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (11) : 1331 - 1334
  • [3] Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale
    Bird, SB
    Dickson, EW
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 38 (06) : 639 - 643
  • [4] Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale
    Farrar, JT
    Young, JP
    LaMoreaux, L
    Werth, JL
    Poole, RM
    [J]. PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) : 149 - 158
  • [5] Influence of comorbidities on pain intensity in patients with chronic low back pain
    Cruz, Martha Cristina Melo
    Verges, Maria Teresa Santeularia
    Llorens, Carme Rius
    Saladich, Ignasi J. Gich
    Puigbo, Elena Catala
    [J]. MEDICINA CLINICA, 2022, 159 (02): : 73 - 77
  • [6] COMPARISON OF P4, NUMERICAL PAIN RATING SCALE AND PRESSURE PAIN THRESHOLD IN PATIENTS HAVING CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN- AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
    Stuti, Shah S.
    Megha, Sheth S.
    Neeta, Vyas J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2014, 3 (02): : 285 - 288
  • [7] Relationship between pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients
    Harahap, Ikhsanuddin Ahmad
    Huda, Siti Nurul
    Tanjung, Dudut
    Siregar, Cholina Trisa
    Nasution, Siti Zahara
    Ariga, Reni Asmara
    Lufthiani
    [J]. ENFERMERIA CLINICA, 2021, 31 (S 4): : 5553 - 5555
  • [8] THE EFFECT OF CHRONIC PAIN INTENSITY ON THE STABILITY LIMITS IN PATIENTS WITH LOW BACK PAIN
    Sipko, Tomasz
    Kuczynski, Michal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 36 (09) : 612 - 618
  • [9] Evaluation of patients with chronic low back pain: intensity of pain, disability and depression
    Stefane, T.
    Munari, A.
    Ito D., Yuji
    Marinovic, A.
    Hortense, P.
    [J]. 15TH WORLD CONGRESS OF PAIN CLINICIANS (WSPC 2012), 2012, : 127 - 130
  • [10] Anchoring the Numeric Pain Scale Changes Pain Intensity Reports in Patients With Chronic But Not With Acute Pain
    Amir, Renana
    Leiba, Ronit
    Eisenberg, Elon
    [J]. PAIN PRACTICE, 2019, 19 (03) : 283 - 288