Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral etoposide

被引:44
|
作者
Toffoli, G
Corona, G
Sorio, R
Robieux, I
Basso, B
Colussi, AM
Boiocchi, M
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Ctr Riferimento Oncol, Div Med Oncol, I-33081 Aviano, PN, Italy
[2] Natl Canc Ctr, Pharmacol Grp, Dept Expt Oncol 1, I-33081 Aviano, PN, Italy
关键词
cancer; etoposide; haematological toxicity; pharmacodynamics; population pharmacokinetics;
D O I
10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01468.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aims To study the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral etoposide in patients with solid tumours. Methods A prospective, open label, cross-over, bioavailability study was performed in 50 adult patients with miscellaneous, advanced stage solid tumours, who were receiving oral (100 mg capsules) etoposide for 14 days and i.v. (50 mg) etoposide on day 1 or day 7 in randomised order during the first cycle treatment. Total and unbound etoposide concentration were assayed by h.p.l.c. Population PK parameters estimation was done by using the P-Pharm software (Simed). Haematological toxicity and tumour response were the main pharmacodynamic endpoints. Results Mean clearance was 1. 14 1 h(-1) (CV 25%). Creatinine clearance was the only covariable to significantly reduce clearance variability (residual CV 18%). (CL=0.74+0.0057 CLCR; r(2)=0.32). Mean bioavailability was 45% (CV 22%) and mean protein binding 91.5% (CV 5%). Exposure to free, pharmacologically active etoposide (free AUC p.o.) was highly variable (mean value 2.8 mg l(-1) h; CV 64% range 0.4-9.5), It decreased with increased creatinine clearance and increased with age which accounted for 9% of the CV. Mean free AUC p.o. was the best predictor of neutropenia. Free AUC(50) (exposure producing a 50%, reduction in absolute neutrophil count) was 1.80 mg l(-1) h. In patients with lung cancer, the free AUC p.o. was higher in the two patients with responsive tumour (5.9 mg l(-1) h) than in patients with stable (2.1 mg l(-1) h) or progressive disease (2.3 mg l(-1) h) (P=0.01). Conclusions Exposure to free etoposide during prolonged oral treatment is highly variable and is the main determinant of pharmacodynamic effects. The population PK model based on creatinine clearance is poorly predictive of exposure. Therapeutic drug monitoring would be necessary for dose individualization or to study the relationship between exposure and antitumour effect.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 519
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral etoposide in children with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia
    Edick, MJ
    Gajjar, A
    Mahmoud, HH
    van de Poll, MEC
    Harrison, PL
    Panetta, JC
    Rivera, GK
    Ribeiro, RC
    Sandlund, JT
    Boyett, JM
    Pui, CH
    Relling, MV
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (07) : 1340 - 1346
  • [2] PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF PROLONGED ORAL ETOPOSIDE IN WOMEN WITH METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER
    MILLWARD, MJ
    NEWELL, DR
    YUEN, K
    MATTHEWS, JP
    BALMANNO, K
    CHARLTON, CJ
    GUMBRELL, L
    LIND, MJ
    CHAPMAN, F
    PROCTOR, M
    SIMMONDS, D
    CANTWELL, BMJ
    CALVERT, AH
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 37 (1-2) : 161 - 167
  • [3] Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral levodopa in parkinsonian patients
    Triggs, EJ
    Charles, BG
    Contin, M
    Martinelli, P
    Cortelli, P
    Riva, R
    Albani, F
    Baruzzi, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 51 (01) : 59 - 67
  • [4] Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide
    deJong, RS
    Mulder, NH
    Uges, DRA
    Kaul, S
    Winograd, B
    Sleijfer, DT
    Groen, HJM
    Willemse, PHB
    vanderGraaf, WTA
    deVries, EGE
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 75 (11) : 1660 - 1666
  • [5] Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide
    RS de Jong
    NH Mulder
    DRA Uges
    S Kaul
    B Winograd
    DTh Sleijfer
    HJM Groen
    PHB Willemse
    WTA van der Graaf
    EGE de Vries
    British Journal of Cancer, 1997, 75 : 1660 - 1666
  • [6] PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF ORAL NIZATIDINE
    VARGAS, R
    RYAN, J
    MCMAHON, FG
    REGEL, G
    OFFEN, WW
    MATSUMOTO, C
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 28 (01): : 71 - 75
  • [7] PHARMACODYNAMICS AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF ORAL PIRMENOL
    ELLENBOGEN, KA
    ROARK, SF
    SINTETOS, AL
    SMITH, MS
    MCCARTHY, EA
    SMITH, WM
    KATES, RE
    PRITCHETT, ELC
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1987, 42 (04) : 405 - 410
  • [8] SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF HIGH-DOSE ETOPOSIDE
    SCHWINGHAMMER, TL
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (12) : 2768 - 2768
  • [9] Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Oral Propranolol in Pediatric Patients With Infantile Hemangioma
    Takechi, Tomoki
    Kumokawa, Tadao
    Kato, Rumiko
    Higuchi, Takeshi
    Kaneko, Tsuyoshi
    Ieiri, Ichiro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 58 (10): : 1361 - 1370
  • [10] Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of anesthetics
    Olofsen, E
    Dahan, A
    AAPS JOURNAL, 2005, 7 (02):