Framework for Assessing Ethical Aspects of Algorithms and Their Encompassing Socio-Technical System

被引:3
|
作者
van Bruxvoort, Xadya [1 ]
van Keulen, Maurice [2 ]
机构
[1] M&I Partners, NL-3708 Zeist, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Fac EEMCS, NL-7522 Enschede, Netherlands
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 23期
关键词
ethics; algorithms; artificial intelligence; responsible AI; fairness; ethical framework; fraud detection; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; BLACK-BOX; TECHNOLOGIES; BIAS;
D O I
10.3390/app112311187
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
In the transition to a data-driven society, organizations have introduced data-driven algorithms that often apply artificial intelligence. In this research, an ethical framework was developed to ensure robustness and completeness and to avoid and mitigate potential public uproar. We take a socio-technical perspective, i.e., view the algorithm embedded in an organization with infrastructure, rules, and procedures as one to-be-designed system. The framework consists of five ethical principles: beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice, and explicability. It can be used during the design for identification of relevant concerns. The framework has been validated by applying it to real-world fraud detection cases: Systeem Risico Indicatie (SyRI) of the Dutch government and the algorithm of the municipality of Amersfoort. The former is a controversial country-wide algorithm that was ultimately prohibited by court. The latter is an algorithm in development. In both cases, it proved effective in identifying all ethical risks. For SyRI, all concerns found in the media were also identified by the framework, mainly focused on transparency of the entire socio-technical system. For the municipality of Amersfoort, the framework highlighted risks regarding the amount of sensitive data and communication to and with the public, presenting a more thorough overview compared to the risks the media raised.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Socio-Technical System Design Framework for People with Disability
    Liu, Peng
    Lu, Tun
    Gu, Ning
    [J]. COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL COMPUTING, CHINESECSCW 2018, 2019, 917 : 272 - 284
  • [2] Towards a political framework for socio-technical system design
    Koehler, Andrew
    Taylor, Karen
    [J]. 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2007, : 132 - +
  • [3] A socio-technical framework for assessing the viability of carbon capture and storage technology
    Markusson, Nils
    Kern, Florian
    Watson, Jim
    Arapostathis, Stathis
    Chalmers, Hannah
    Ghaleigh, Navraj
    Heptonstall, Philip
    Pearson, Peter
    Rossati, David
    Russell, Stewart
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2012, 79 (05) : 903 - 918
  • [4] Assessing the reliability of socio-technical systems
    Gregoriades, Andreas
    Sutcliffe, Alistair
    Shin, Jae-Eun
    [J]. Systems Engineering, 2003, 6 (03) : 210 - 223
  • [5] SOME SOCIO-TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF AUTOMATION
    EMERY, FE
    MAREK, J
    [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 1962, 15 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [6] Socio-technical aspects of display units
    Noro, K
    [J]. DISPLAYS, 2002, 23 (1-2) : 3 - 9
  • [7] Socio-technical systems cybersecurity framework
    Malatji, Masike
    Von Solms, Sune
    Marnewick, Annlize
    [J]. INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SECURITY, 2019, 27 (02) : 233 - 272
  • [8] Nanomedicine: a socio-technical system
    Massaro, Sebastiano
    Lorenzoni, Gianni
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 173
  • [9] Socio-Technical Congruence: A Framework for Assessing the Impact of Technical and Work Dependencies on Software Development Productivity
    Cataldo, Marcelo
    Herbsleb, James D.
    Carley, Kathleen M.
    [J]. ESEM'08: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2008 ACM-IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND MEASUREMENT, 2008, : 2 - +
  • [10] A framework for conceptualizing and assessing the resilience of essential services produced by socio-technical systems
    van der Merwe, Susara E.
    Biggs, Reinette
    Preiser, Rika
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (02):