Simulating spray droplet impaction outcomes: comparison with experimental data

被引:15
|
作者
Zabkiewicz, Jerzy A. [1 ]
Pethiyagoda, Ravindra [2 ]
Forster, W. Alison [3 ]
van Leeuwen, Rebecca [3 ]
Moroney, Timothy J. [2 ]
McCue, Scott W. [2 ]
机构
[1] SciCon Sci Consultants Ltd, 8 Link Rd, Rotorua, New Zealand
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Math Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Plant Protect Chem NZ Ltd, Rotorua, New Zealand
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
PRSm; droplet shatter; spray retention; simulation; SURFACES; COLLISIONS; RETENTION;
D O I
10.1002/ps.5736
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND A suite of plant retention spray models has been developed to simulate spray retention using virtual surfaces (either single leaves or whole plants) and their outputs compared with experimental data for the equivalent spray scenarios. RESULTS The results for a single formulation (0.1% v/v lecithin mixture in water) and difficult to wet plant species Chenopodium album L (common lambsquarters) are presented. They include experimental observations with single leaves, as well as simulations of virtual impaction events, conducted to provide for the first time estimates of f (the proportion of theoretical impact drop diameter at shatter). With this factor prescribed, multi-plant simulations using a range of nozzle types and droplet sizes (volume mean diameter (VMD) range 241 to 530 mu m) are compared with equivalent experimentally determined spray retention by real plants. The simulations demonstrated that impaction resulted predominantly in shatter with the production of daughter droplets, and that retention is mainly due to re-capture of these droplets. Overall the simulations show the same trends as experimental retention results from different nozzle applications, but at best predicted retention results were 68% to 79% of experimental percentage retention, depending on plant spacing. CONCLUSIONS Retention is the result of some primary drop capture but predominantly by recapture of shatter droplets as the modelling illustrates. The value of f affects the droplet shatter outcome and can result in fewer, more energetic daughter droplets, or more droplets but with lower energies. However, this effect alone cannot explain the discrepancy between actual and simulated results. Possible operational influences are discussed. (c) 2020 Society of Chemical Industry
引用
收藏
页码:3469 / 3476
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spray droplet impaction outcomes for different plant species and spray formulations
    Massinon, Mathieu
    De Cock, Nicolas
    Forster, W. Alison
    Nairn, Justin J.
    Mccue, Scott W.
    Zabkiewicz, Jerzy A.
    Lebeau, Frederic
    CROP PROTECTION, 2017, 99 : 65 - 75
  • [2] Comparison of wall spray impaction models with experimental data on drop velocities and sizes
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, UMIST, Manchester, United Kingdom
    不详
    Int J Heat Fluid Flow, 4 (424-438):
  • [3] Comparison of wall spray impaction models with experimental data on drop velocities and sizes
    Park, K
    Watkins, AP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 1996, 17 (04) : 424 - 438
  • [4] Challenges of simulating droplet coalescence within a spray
    Nijdam, JJ
    Guo, B
    Fletcher, DF
    Langrish, TAG
    DRYING TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 22 (06) : 1463 - 1488
  • [5] Experimental study on the droplet characteristics in the spray tip region: Comparison between the free and impinging spray
    Zhan, Cheng
    Luo, Hongliang
    Chang, Feixiang
    Nishida, Keiya
    Ogata, Youichi
    Tang, Chenglong
    Feng, Zehao
    Huang, Zuohua
    EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE, 2021, 121
  • [6] Experimental study on cooling of electronics components by spray impaction
    House No 21, Sector 16, Hisar 125 001, India
    不详
    J Inst Eng India Mech Eng Div, 2008, OCTOBER (11-16): : 11 - 16
  • [7] COMPARISON OF IMPACTION AND NON-IMPACTION METHODS FOR MEASURING SPRAY PATTERNS FROM MDIS
    Pitluk, Z.
    Pallas, S.
    Graaf, J.
    Farina, D.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2014, 27 (04) : A24 - A24
  • [8] Comparison of spray/wall impingement models with experimental data
    Lee, SH
    Ryou, HS
    JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2000, 16 (06) : 939 - 945
  • [9] Droplet shape oscillations: Effects on spray impaction and retention and Fourier analysis of their natural frequencies
    Brazee, RD
    Bukovac, MJ
    Cooper, JA
    Reichard, DL
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1999, 42 (02): : 319 - 325
  • [10] COMPARISON OF DROPLET COMBUSTION MODELS IN SPRAY COMBUSTION
    JIANG, TL
    HSU, W
    JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 1993, 9 (04) : 644 - 646