Reflections on 10 years of software process simulation modeling: A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, He [1 ,2 ]
Kitchenham, Barbara [3 ]
Pfahl, Dietmar [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl ICT Australia, Locked Bag 9013, Alexandria, NSW 1435, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Engn & Comp Sci, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] Keele Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Math, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[4] Simula Res Lab, NO-1325 Fornebu, Norway
[5] Univ Oslo, Dept Informat, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
ProSim; software process simulation; systematic literature review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Software process simulation modeling (SPSM) has become an increasingly active research area since its introduction in the late 1980s. Particularly during the last ten years the related research community and the number of publications have been growing. The objective of this research is to provide insights about the evolution of SPSM research during the last 10 years. A systematic literature review was proposed with two subsequent stages to achieve this goal. This paper presents the preliminary results of the first stage of the review that is exclusively focusing on a core set of publication sources. More than 200 relevant publications were analyzed in order to find answers to the research questions, including the purposes and scopes of SPSM, application domains, and predominant research issues. From the analysis the following conclusions could be drawn: (1) Categories for classifying software process simulation models as suggested by the authors of a landmark publication in 1999 should be adjusted and refined to better capture the diversity of published models. (2) Research improving the efficiency of SPSM is gaining importance. (3) Hybrid process simulation models have attracted interest as a possibility to more realistically capture complex real-world software processes.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Software Process Simulation Modeling: Systematic literature review
    Garcia-Garcia, J. A.
    Enriquez, J. G.
    Ruiz, M.
    Arevalo, C.
    Jimenez-Ramirez, A.
    [J]. COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES, 2020, 70
  • [2] Software Process Simulation Modeling: An Extended Systematic Review
    Zhang, He
    Kitchenham, Barbara
    Pfahl, Dietmar
    [J]. NEW MODELING CONCEPTS FOR TODAY'S SOFTWARE PROCESSES, 2010, 6195 : 309 - +
  • [3] The Role of Software Process Simulation Modeling in Software Risk Management: a Systematic Review
    Liu, Dapeng
    Wang, Qing
    Xiao, Junchao
    [J]. ESEM: 2009 3RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND MEASUREMENT, 2009, : 303 - 312
  • [4] Software process modeling languages: A systematic literature review
    Garcia-Borgonon, L.
    Barcelona, M. A.
    Garcia-Garcia, J. A.
    Alba, M.
    Escalona, M. J.
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 56 (02) : 103 - 116
  • [5] A systematic literature review on the industrial use of software process simulation
    Bin Ali, Nauman
    Petersen, Kai
    Wohlin, Claes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2014, 97 : 65 - 85
  • [6] Metrics for software process simulation modeling
    Liu, Bohan
    Zhang, He
    Dong, Liming
    Wang, Zhiqi
    Li, Shanshan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 2024,
  • [7] Experience with software process simulation and modeling
    Scacchi, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 1999, 46 (2-3) : 183 - 192
  • [8] A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering
    Kitchenham, Barbara
    Brereton, Pearl
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 55 (12) : 2049 - 2075
  • [9] Empirical analysis in software process simulation modeling
    Raffo, DM
    Kellner, MI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2000, 53 (01) : 31 - 41
  • [10] Software Process Simulation over the Past Decade: Trends Discovery from A Systematic Review
    Zhang, He
    Kitchenham, Barbara
    Pfahl, Dietmar
    [J]. ESEM'08: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2008 ACM-IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND MEASUREMENT, 2008, : 345 - 347