Reptile responses to anthropogenic habitat modification: A global meta-analysis

被引:90
|
作者
Doherty, Tim S. [1 ]
Balouch, Sara [1 ]
Bell, Kristian [1 ]
Burns, Thomas J. [1 ]
Feldman, Anat [2 ]
Fist, Charles [1 ]
Garvey, Timothy F. [1 ]
Jessop, Tim S. [1 ]
Meiri, Shai [2 ,3 ]
Driscoll, Don A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Ctr Integrat Ecol, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, Vic 3220, Australia
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Zool, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Steinhardt Museum Nat Hist, Tel Aviv, Israel
来源
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY | 2020年 / 29卷 / 07期
关键词
agricultural intensification; deforestation; ecological disturbance; extinction risk; habitat modification; land-use change; lizards; reptiles; snakes; Squamata; LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS; EXTINCTION RISK; SPECIES SENSITIVITY; LAND-USE; NICHE BREADTH; RANGE SIZE; R PACKAGE; DIVERSITY; BIOLOGY; FRAGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1111/geb.13091
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aim The aim was to determine how reptile populations respond to anthropogenic habitat modification and determine whether species traits and environmental factors influence such responses. Location Global. Time period 1981-2018. Major taxa studied Squamata. Methods We compiled a database of 56 studies reporting how habitat modification affects reptile abundance and calculated standardized mean differences in abundance (Hedges' g). We used Bayesian meta-analytical models to test whether responses to habitat modification depended on body size, clutch size, reproductive mode, habitat specialization, range size, disturbance type, vegetation type, temperature and precipitation. Results Based on 815 effect sizes from 376 species, we found an overall negative effect of habitat modification on reptile abundance (mean Hedges' g = -0.43, 95% credible intervals = -0.61 to -0.26). Reptile abundance was, on average, one-third lower in modified compared with unmodified habitats. Small range sizes and small clutch sizes were associated with more negative responses to habitat modification, although the responses were weak and the credible intervals overlapped zero. We detected no effects of body size, habitat specialization, reproductive mode (egg-laying or live-bearing), temperature or precipitation. Some families exhibited more negative responses than others, although overall there was no phylogenetic signal in the data. Mining had the most negative impacts on reptile abundance, followed by agriculture, grazing, plantations and patch size reduction, whereas the mean effect of logging was neutral. Main conclusions Habitat modification is a key cause of reptile population declines, although there is variability in responses both within and between species, families and vegetation types. The effect of disturbance type appeared to be related to the intensity of habitat modification. Ongoing development of environmentally sustainable practices that ameliorate anthropogenic impacts is urgently needed to prevent declines in reptile populations.
引用
收藏
页码:1265 / 1279
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Primate responses to anthropogenic habitat disturbance: A pantropical meta-analysis
    de Almeida-Rocha, Juliana M.
    Peres, Carlos A.
    Oliveira, Leonardo C.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 215 : 30 - 38
  • [2] A meta-analysis of bees' responses to anthropogenic disturbance
    Winfree, Rachael
    Aguilar, Ramiro
    Vazquez, Diego P.
    LeBuhn, Gretchen
    Aizen, Marcelo A.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2009, 90 (08) : 2068 - 2076
  • [3] A global meta-analysis on patterns of amphibian and reptile diversity in agroforestry systems
    Cervantes-Lopez, Martin de Jesus
    Morante-Filho, Jose Carlos
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2024, 51
  • [4] Conservation of grasslands and savannas: A meta-analysis on mammalian responses to anthropogenic disturbance
    de Lima, Daniela Oliveira
    Lorini, Maria Lucia
    Vieira, Marcus Vinicius
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2018, 45 : 72 - 78
  • [5] Global Meta-analysis of Airborne Bacterial Communities and Associations with Anthropogenic Activities
    Jiang, Xiaoqing
    Wang, Chunhui
    Guo, Jinyuan
    Hou, Jiaheng
    Guo, Xiao
    Zhang, Haoyu
    Tan, Jie
    Li, Mo
    Li, Xin
    Zhu, Huaiqiu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 56 (14) : 9891 - 9902
  • [6] A meta-analysis of responses of soil biota to global change
    Blankinship, Joseph C.
    Niklaus, Pascal A.
    Hungate, Bruce A.
    [J]. OECOLOGIA, 2011, 165 (03) : 553 - 565
  • [7] A meta-analysis of responses of soil biota to global change
    Joseph C. Blankinship
    Pascal A. Niklaus
    Bruce A. Hungate
    [J]. Oecologia, 2011, 165 : 553 - 565
  • [8] Genetic effects of anthropogenic habitat fragmentation on remnant animal and plant populations: a meta-analysis
    Schlaepfer, Daniel R.
    Braschler, Brigitte
    Rusterholz, Hans-Peter
    Baur, Bruno
    [J]. ECOSPHERE, 2018, 9 (10):
  • [9] Meta-analysis of anthropogenic habitat disturbance effects on animal-mediated seed dispersal
    Fonturbel, Francisco E.
    Candia, Alina B.
    Malebran, Javiera
    Salazar, Daniela A.
    Gonzalez-Browne, Catalina
    Medel, Rodrigo
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2015, 21 (11) : 3951 - 3960
  • [10] Soil fauna responses to invasive alien plants are determined by trophic groups and habitat structure: a global meta-analysis
    Abgrall, Corentin
    Forey, Estelle
    Chauvat, Matthieu
    [J]. OIKOS, 2019, 128 (10) : 1390 - 1401