Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a retrospective study

被引:33
|
作者
Caillet, Martin [1 ]
Vandromme, Jean [1 ]
Rozenberg, Serge [1 ]
Paesmans, Marianne [1 ,2 ]
Germay, Olivier [1 ]
Degueldre, Michel [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels, Univ Hosp St Pierre, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Free Univ Brussels, Ctr Data, Inst Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Robot; laparoscopy; microsurgery; tubal anastomosis; FEMALE STERILIZATION; ANASTOMOSIS; REVERSAL; FERTILITY; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.028
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the pregnancy and delivery outcome of robot-assisted tubal reanastomosis. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: University hospital. Patient(s): Ninety-seven patients with available follow-up who underwent the reversal of tubal ligation, with a median age of 37 years (range, 24-47 years). Intervention(s): Tubal reanastomosis by robot-assisted laparoscopy. Main Outcome Measure(s): Analysis of the distribution of time to conception and to estimate the crude pregnancy and birth rates at 2 years. Result(s): The overall pregnancy and birth rates were 71%, (95% confidence interval [CI], 61%-80%) and 62% (95% CI, 52%-72%). Ninety-one percent (95% CI, 76%-98%) of patients <35 years old became pregnant, and 88% (95% CI, 72%-97%) delivered at least once. The corresponding pregnancy and delivery rates were 75% (95% CI, 57%-89%) and 66% (95% CI, 47%-81%) between 36 and 39 years old, 50% (95% CI, 25%-75%) and 43.8% (95% CI, 20%-70%) between 40 and 42 years old, 33% (95% CI, 10%-65%) and 8.3% (95% CI, <1%-38%) after the age of 43 years. Conclusion(s): This study reports satisfactory birth rates after tubal reanastomosis by robot-assisted laparoscopy in patients aged 40 years or less. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010;94:1844-7. (C)2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:1844 / 1847
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis:: a feasibility study
    Degueldre, M
    Vandromme, J
    Huong, PT
    Cadière, GB
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (05) : 1020 - 1023
  • [2] Laparoscopic non-microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: A retrospective cohort study
    de Water, Marije van
    Bosteels, Jan
    De Sutter, Petra
    Weyers, Steven
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2015, 20 (03): : 193 - 200
  • [3] Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis:: a preliminary study
    Çetin, MT
    Demir, SC
    Toksöz, L
    Kadayifçi, O
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2002, 7 (03): : 162 - 166
  • [4] Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: the two-stitch technique
    Misirlioglu, S.
    Cetin, M. T.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27
  • [5] ROUTINE FOR MICROSURGICAL TUBAL REANASTOMOSIS
    HOFFMAN, JJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY, 1978, 23 (04) : 257 - 259
  • [6] Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis
    Miranda, Cristian S.
    Carvajal, Antonio R.
    Venditti, Paula
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2005, 2 (04) : 313 - 315
  • [7] MICROSURGICAL TUBAL REANASTOMOSIS - THE ROLE OF SPLINTS
    MELDRUM, DR
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1981, 57 (05): : 613 - 619
  • [8] Robotically assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis in a porcine model: A pilot study
    Margossian, H
    Garcia-Ruiz, A
    Falcone, T
    Goldberg, JM
    Attaran, M
    Miller, JH
    Gagner, M
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 1998, 8 (02): : 69 - 73
  • [9] Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical uterine horn anastomosis
    Margossian, H
    Garcia-Ruiz, A
    Falcone, T
    Goldberg, JM
    Attaran, M
    Gagner, M
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1998, 70 (03) : 530 - 534
  • [10] MICROSURGICAL PROXIMAL TUBAL REANASTOMOSIS - THE ROLE OF STENTS
    MELDRUM, DR
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1980, 34 (03) : 303 - 303