Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in staging of malignant breast lesions-a feasibility study

被引:13
|
作者
Ahsberg, Kristina [1 ,2 ]
Gardfjell, Anna [3 ]
Nimeus, Emma [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Rasmussen, Rogvi [6 ]
Behmer, Catharina [7 ]
Zackrisson, Sophia [8 ,9 ]
Ryden, Lisa [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Halland Hosp, Dept Surg, S-30185 Halmstad, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Surg, Inst Clin Sci, Lund, Sweden
[3] Blekinge Hosp, Dept Surg, Karlskrona, Sweden
[4] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Lund, Sweden
[5] Lund Univ, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Oncol, Lund, Sweden
[6] Skane Univ Hosp, Unilabs Breast Ctr, Lund, Sweden
[7] Helsingborg Hosp, Unilabs Breast Ctr, Helsingborg, Sweden
[8] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Imaging & Funct Med, Malmo, Sweden
[9] Lund Univ, Dept Translat Med, Diagnost Radiol, Lund, Sweden
关键词
Breast cancer; Preoperative staging; Contrast-enhanced mammography; CEM; Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography; CESM; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; CANCER; MRI; CESM; PERFORMANCE; CARCINOMA; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-020-01865-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this feasibility study was to evaluate the added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in preoperative staging of malignant breast lesions, beyond standard assessment with digital mammography and ultrasound, as a base for a future prospective randomized trial. Materials and methods Forty-seven patients, with confirmed or strongly suspected malignant breast lesions after standard assessment (digital mammography (DM) and ultrasound (US)), scheduled for primary surgery, were invited to undergo CEM as an additional preoperative procedure. The primary endpoint was change in treatment due to CEM findings, defined as mastectomy instead of partial mastectomy or contrariwise, bilateral surgery instead of unilateral or neoadjuvant treatment instead of primary surgery. Accuracy in tumour extent estimation compared to histopathology was evaluated by Bland-Altman statistics. Number of extra biopsies and adverse events were recorded. Results In 10/47 patients (21%), findings from CEM affected the primary treatment. Agreement with histopathology regarding extent estimation was better for CEM (mean difference - 1.36, SD +/- 18.45) in comparison with DM (- 4.18, SD +/- 26.20) and US (- 8.36, SD +/- 24.30). Additional biopsies were taken from 19 lesions in 13 patients. Nine biopsies showed malignant outcome. No major adverse events occurred. Conclusion The feasibility of preoperative additional CEM was found to be satisfactory without any serious negative effects. Results imply an added value of CEM in preoperative staging of breast cancer. Further evaluation in larger prospective randomized trials is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in staging of malignant breast lesions—a feasibility study
    Kristina Åhsberg
    Anna Gardfjell
    Emma Nimeus
    Rogvi Rasmussen
    Catharina Behmer
    Sophia Zackrisson
    Lisa Ryden
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 18
  • [2] The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions-a prospective randomized multicenter study
    Ahsberg, Kristina
    Gardfjell, Anna
    Nimeus, Emma
    Ryden, Lisa
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [3] The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study
    Kristina Åhsberg
    Anna Gardfjell
    Emma Nimeus
    Lisa Ryden
    Sophia Zackrisson
    BMC Cancer, 21
  • [4] Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI for breast cancer staging: detection of additional malignant lesions not seen on conventional imaging
    Donna B. Taylor
    Sally Burrows
    Christobel M. Saunders
    Paul M. Parizel
    Angela Ives
    European Radiology Experimental, 7
  • [5] Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI for breast cancer staging: detection of additional malignant lesions not seen on conventional imaging
    Taylor, Donna B.
    Burrows, Sally
    Saunders, Christobel M.
    Parizel, Paul M.
    Ives, Angela
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [6] Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography in assessment of breast asymmetries
    Wessam, Rasha
    Gomaa, Mohammed Mohammed Mohammed
    Fouad, Mona Ahmed
    Mokhtar, Sherif Mohamed
    Tohamey, Yasmin Mounir
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 92 (1098):
  • [7] Implementing the advantages of contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced breast MRI in breast cancer staging
    Fallenberg, Eva M.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025, 35 (01) : 160 - 162
  • [8] Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study
    Clauser, Paola
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    Kapetas, Panagiotis
    Hoernig, Mathias
    Weber, Michael
    Leone, Federica
    Bernathova, Maria
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 52 (02) : 589 - 595
  • [9] Feasibility of contrast-enhanced mammography in women with breast implants
    Hogan, Molly P.
    Amir, Tali
    Mango, Victoria L.
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2023, 93 (31-33) : 31 - 33
  • [10] Added Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Postscreening Assessment
    Tardivel, Anne-Marie
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Dunant, Ariane
    Delaloge, Suzette
    Mazouni, Chafika
    Mathieu, Marie-Christine
    Dromain, Clarisse
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (05): : 520 - 528