Effects of Multisensory Distractor Interference on Attentional Driving

被引:6
|
作者
Lin, Chin-Teng [1 ]
Tian, Yanqiu [1 ]
Wang, Yu-Kai [1 ]
Tien-Thong Nguyen Do [1 ]
Chang, Yao-Lung [2 ,3 ]
King, Jung-Tai [2 ,3 ]
Huang, Kuan-Chih [2 ,3 ]
Liao, Lun-De [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & Informat Technol, Australian Artificial Intelligence Inst, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
[2] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Ctr Intelligent Drug Syst & Smart Biodevices IDS2, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Brain Res Ctr, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[4] Natl Hlth Res Inst, Inst Biomed Engn & Nanomed, Miaoli 35053, Taiwan
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Task analysis; Electroencephalography; Visualization; Interference; Wheels; Automobiles; Australia; Attentional driving; multisensory distractions; electroencephalography (EEG); brain oscillation; GAMMA-BAND ACTIVITY; CENTRAL EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; TOP-DOWN MODULATION; DRIVER DISTRACTION; EYE-MOVEMENTS; ALPHA; THETA; OSCILLATIONS; EEG; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1109/TITS.2022.3149884
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Distracted driving refers to multisensory integration and attention shifts between attentional driving and different interferences from different modalities, including visual and auditory stimuli. Here, we compared the behavioral performance with interacting multisensory distractors during attentional driving. Then, the independent component analysis (ICA) and event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) were applied to investigate the neural oscillation changes. The behavioral results showed that the response times (RTs) increased when distractors appeared in response to attentional driving. Moreover, the RTs were longer when the distractor interference was presented in the auditory modality compared with the visual modality. Eye movement intervals showed shorter tracking saccades under distractor interference. These results may indicate that attentional driving performance was impaired under the exposure to multisensory distractor interference. The ERSPs under visual and auditory distraction exposure showed decreased beta power in the frontal area, increased theta and delta power in the central area, and decreased alpha power in the parietal area. During this process, distracted driving under cross-modal sensory interference required more neural oscillation involvement. Moreover, the visual modality showed increased gamma power in the frontal, central, parietal and occipital areas, while the auditory modality showed decreased gamma power in the frontal area, indicating that auditory interference could intervene in top-down attentional processing.
引用
收藏
页码:10395 / 10403
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interference of irrelevant information in multisensory selection depends on attentional set
    Jensen, Anne
    Merz, Simon
    Spence, Charles
    Frings, Christian
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (03) : 1176 - 1195
  • [2] Interference of irrelevant information in multisensory selection depends on attentional set
    Anne Jensen
    Simon Merz
    Charles Spence
    Christian Frings
    [J]. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2020, 82 : 1176 - 1195
  • [3] Sources of interference in the attentional blink: Target-distractor similarity revisited
    William S. Maki
    Giulia Bussard
    Kellie Lopez
    Beth Digby
    [J]. Perception & Psychophysics, 2003, 65 : 188 - 201
  • [4] Sources of interference in the attentional blink: Target-distractor similarity revisited
    Maki, WS
    Bussard, G
    Lopez, K
    Digby, B
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2003, 65 (02): : 188 - 201
  • [5] Effects of anticipatory attention on distractor interference
    Jacobs, T
    Wojciulik, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, : 21 - 21
  • [6] Auditory attentional capture: Effects of singleton distractor sounds
    Dalton, P
    Lavie, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2004, 30 (01) : 180 - 193
  • [7] The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: An attentional blink study
    Jiang, YH
    Chun, MM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2001, 27 (03) : 664 - 679
  • [8] Target—distractor interference in the attentional blink implicates the locus coeruleus—norepinephrine system
    Christopher M. Warren
    Andreas T. Breuer
    Justin Kantner
    Daniel Fiset
    Caroline Blais
    Michael E. J. Masson
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2009, 16 : 1106 - 1111
  • [9] Visual attentional guidance during smooth pursuit eye movements: Distractor interference is independent of distractor-target similarity
    Stolte, Moritz
    Kraus, Leon
    Ansorge, Ulrich
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 60 (12)
  • [10] Attentional selection by distractor suppression
    Caputo, G
    Guerra, S
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 1998, 38 (05) : 669 - 689