An integrated path for spatial capture-recapture and animal movement modeling

被引:27
|
作者
McClintock, Brett T. [1 ]
Abrahms, Briana [2 ]
Chandler, Richard B. [3 ]
Conn, Paul B. [1 ]
Converse, Sarah J. [4 ,5 ]
Emmet, Robert L. [6 ]
Gardner, Beth [7 ]
Hostetter, Nathan J. [8 ]
Johnson, Devin S. [1 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Marine Mammal Lab, NMFS Alaska Fisheries Sci Ctr, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Biol, Life Sci Bldg,Box 351800, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, 180 E Green St, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Univ Washington, US Geol Survey, Washington Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Aquat & Fishery Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Quantitat Ecol & Resource Management, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[8] Univ Washington, Sch Aquat & Fishery Sci, Washington Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
animal movement; density and distribution; integrated population model; mark-recapture; movement ecology; population dynamics; population ecology; spatial capture-recapture; HIDDEN MARKOV-MODELS; BROWNIAN BRIDGE MOVEMENT; RESOURCE SELECTION; POPULATION-DENSITY; TELEMETRY DATA; BAYESIAN-INFERENCE; HABITAT SELECTION; STATE-SPACE; MULTIPLE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1002/ecy.3473
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecologists and conservation biologists increasingly rely on spatial capture-recapture (SCR) and movement modeling to study animal populations. Historically, SCR has focused on population-level processes (e.g., vital rates, abundance, density, and distribution), whereas animal movement modeling has focused on the behavior of individuals (e.g., activity budgets, resource selection, migration). Even though animal movement is clearly a driver of population-level patterns and dynamics, technical and conceptual developments to date have not forged a firm link between the two fields. Instead, movement modeling has typically focused on the individual level without providing a coherent scaling from individual- to population-level processes, whereas SCR has typically focused on the population level while greatly simplifying the movement processes that give rise to the observations underlying these models. In our view, the integration of SCR and animal movement modeling has tremendous potential for allowing ecologists to scale up from individuals to populations and advancing the types of inferences that can be made at the intersection of population, movement, and landscape ecology. Properly accounting for complex animal movement processes can also potentially reduce bias in estimators of population-level parameters, thereby improving inferences that are critical for species conservation and management. This introductory article to the Special Feature reviews recent advances in SCR and animal movement modeling, establishes a common notation, highlights potential advantages of linking individual-level (Lagrangian) movements to population-level (Eulerian) processes, and outlines a general conceptual framework for the integration of movement and SCR models. We then identify important avenues for future research, including key challenges and potential pitfalls in the developments and applications that lie ahead.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrated animal movement and spatial capture-recapture models: Simulation, implementation, and inference
    Gardner, Beth
    McClintock, Brett T.
    Converse, Sarah J.
    Hostetter, Nathan J.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2022, 103 (10)
  • [2] Modeling spatiotemporal abundance and movement dynamics using an integrated spatial capture-recapture movement model
    Hostetter, Nathan J.
    Regehr, Eric, V
    Wilson, Ryan R.
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Converse, Sarah J.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2022, 103 (10)
  • [3] Confronting spatial capture-recapture models with realistic animal movement simulations
    Theng, Meryl
    Milleret, Cyril
    Bracis, Chloe
    Cassey, Phillip
    Delean, Steven
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2022, 103 (10)
  • [4] Forecasting wildlife movement with spatial capture-recapture
    Crum, Nathan J.
    Gowan, Timothy A.
    Ramachandran, Kandethody M.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 14 (11): : 2844 - 2855
  • [5] Spatial Capture-Recapture
    Russell, Robin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 78 (07): : 1319 - 1320
  • [6] Spatial Capture-Recapture Models
    Borchers, David
    Fewster, Rachel
    [J]. STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 31 (02) : 219 - 232
  • [7] Spatial capture-recapture for categorically marked populations with an application to genetic capture-recapture
    Augustine, Ben C.
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Murphy, Sean M.
    Chandler, Richard B.
    Cox, John J.
    Kelly, Marcella J.
    [J]. ECOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (04):
  • [8] Modeling Individual Animal Histories with Multistate Capture-Recapture Models
    Lebreton, Jean-Dominique
    Nichols, James D.
    Barker, Richard J.
    Pradel, Roger
    Spendelow, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, VOL 41, 2009, 41 : 87 - 173
  • [9] Towards automated animal density estimation with acoustic spatial capture-recapture
    Wang, Yuheng
    Ye, Juan
    Li, Xiaohui
    Borchers, David L.
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2024, 80 (03)
  • [10] Semiparametric regression in capture-recapture modeling
    Gimenez, O.
    Crainiceanu, C.
    Barbraud, C.
    Jenouvrier, S.
    Morgan, B. J. T.
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2006, 62 (03) : 691 - 698