A Q methodology study of perceptions of poverty among midwestern nursing students

被引:12
|
作者
Work, Janel [1 ]
Hensel, Desiree [1 ]
Decker, Kim A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Nursing, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
Nursing education; Patient-centered care; Poverty; Q methodology; ATTITUDES; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2014.10.017
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objectives: Providing patient-centered care involves understanding how social factors, including poverty, affect health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore nursing students' beliefs surrounding the poor. Design: A Q methodology design was used to discover patterns of perceptions towards those living in poverty. Setting: The study took place on two campuses of a large public, university in the Midwestern United States. Participants: The purposeful sample of 23 Q participants was drawn from students enrolled in the second, third, and final year of study in a baccalaureate nursing program. Methods: Participants rank-ordered their level of agreement with a set of 30 statements regarding poverty. Data were analyzed by a three-step process that included correlating participant profiles, performing factor analysis, and generating factor scores. A factor array and narrative were used to explain the findings. Results: Three viewpoints were identified: judges who tended to feel that poverty was linked to individual behavior; Allies who mostly saw societal reasons for poverty and felt a strong need to assist the poor, and Observers who did not blame individual for their circumstances, but were not as compelled to champion their cause. Conclusions: Given these different perspectives, educators may need to use variety of teaching approaches to help students achieve patient-centered care competencies with their poorest patients. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 332
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interactive Poverty Simulation: Nursing Students' Perceptions of Poverty
    Garrett-Wright, Dawn
    Haughtigan, Kara
    Link, Kim
    [J]. NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 42 (06) : 380 - 382
  • [2] Nursing Students' Perceptions of Menstrual Distress during Clinical Practice: A Q-Methodology Study
    Fu, Ya-Lin
    Yang, Chia-Ling
    Yu, Shu-Chuan
    Lin, Yun-Hsuan
    Hsu, Hsiao-Pei
    Huang, Chiu-Mieh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (06) : 1 - 12
  • [3] Perceptions of video-facilitated debriefing in simulation education among nursing students: Findings from a Q-methodology study
    Yeun, Eun Ja
    Chon, Mi Young
    An, Jeong Hwa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2020, 36 (02) : 62 - 69
  • [4] A study on the types of disaster awareness in nursing students: Q methodology
    Mihyeon Seong
    Dajung Ryu
    Sohyune Sok
    [J]. BMC Nursing, 22
  • [5] A study on the types of disaster awareness in nursing students: Q methodology
    Seong, Mihyeon
    Ryu, Dajung
    Sok, Sohyune
    [J]. BMC NURSING, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [6] Teaching Q Methodology to Prelicensure Nursing Students
    Opsahl, Angela
    Judge, Deborah
    Hensel, Desiree
    [J]. NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 41 (01) : 39 - 40
  • [7] Poverty and health inequalities: Perceptions of social work students and nursing students
    Demirtas, Basak
    Polat, Gonca
    Ates, Funda Seher Ozalp
    Ka'opua, Lana Sue
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2022, 69 (01) : 96 - 105
  • [8] Perceptions of Professionalism Among Nursing Faculty and Nursing Students
    Akhtar-Danesh, Noori
    Baumann, Andrea
    Kolotylo, Camille
    Lawlor, Yvonne
    Tompkins, Catherine
    Lee, Ruth
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2013, 35 (02) : 248 - 271
  • [9] Viewpoints on Undergraduate Research Among Nursing Students Conducting Q-Methodology Studies
    Hensel, Desiree
    Porter, Shana
    Mocek, Paige
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2021, 60 (02) : 96 - 98
  • [10] South African Students' Perceptions of Interracial Contact: A Q-Methodology Study
    Finchilescu, Gillian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 849 - 849