A synthetic view of acceptance and engagement with smart meters in the United States

被引:53
|
作者
Bugden, Dylan [1 ]
Stedman, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Nat Resources, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Climate change; Smart meter; Social acceptance; Energy conservation; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; DISTRIBUTED GENERATION; PRICE CONSCIOUSNESS; ENERGY; FAIRNESS; PERCEPTION; BEHAVIORS; DECISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.025
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Smart meters are a crucial infrastructural feature of a modernizing grid. Smart meters enable dynamic rate structures, a wide range of smart home technologies, energy use feedback, and greater use of distributed renewable energy. Yet, ratepayers are often unfamiliar with smart meters and their benefits, have ambivalent or negative attitudes toward them, and may outright oppose their use. Past research has identified numerous factors that influence acceptance and engagement. However, these factors are tested in isolation and only partially representative of the broader literature on energy technologies. In this study, we compare the relative effect of an expanded range of factors on smart meter acceptance and engagement. We use a survey (N = 609) of homeowners in Ithaca, New York who are part of an upcoming smart meter rollout. We find that, ceteris paribus, familiarity and climate change risk perceptions have the greatest effect on smart meter acceptance, while smart meter acceptance, age, and income have the strongest effect on engagement. Our findings have two primary implications: (1) outreach and communication should focus on increasing familiarity and demonstrating the climate benefits of smart meter enabled products and services; and (2) that outreach and communication is insufficient to increase uptake by all segments of the population.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 145
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Smart meters: A users' view
    Kerrigan, Daniel J.
    Gamberini, Luciano
    Spagnolli, Anna
    Jacucci, Giulio
    [J]. PSYCHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 9 (01): : 55 - 72
  • [2] Consumer Willingness and Acceptance of Smart Meters in Indonesia
    Chawla, Yash
    Kowalska-Pyzalska, Anna
    Widayat, Widayat
    [J]. RESOURCES-BASEL, 2019, 8 (04):
  • [3] What improves smart meters' implementation? A statistical meta-analysis on smart meters' acceptance
    Gumz, Jonathan
    Fettermann, Diego Castro
    [J]. SMART AND SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 11 (04) : 1116 - 1136
  • [4] The acceptance of evolution: A developmental view of Generation X in the United States
    Miller, Jon D.
    Laspra, Belen
    Polino, Carmelo
    Branch, Glenn
    Pennock, Robert T.
    Ackerman, Mark S.
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2024,
  • [5] The social dimensions of smart meters in the United States: Demographics, privacy, and technology readiness
    Hmielowski, Jay D.
    Boyd, Amanda D.
    Harvey, Genevieve
    Joo, Jinho
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 55 : 189 - 197
  • [6] Nested logics and smart meter adoption: Institutional processes and organizational change in the diffusion of smart meters in the United States
    Kallman, Meghan Elizabeth
    Frickel, Scott
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 57
  • [7] Between the technology acceptance model and sustainable energy technology acceptance model: Investigating smart meter acceptance in the United States
    Chen, Chien-fei
    Xu, Xiaojing
    Arpan, Laura
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, 25 : 93 - 104
  • [8] Smart meters and public acceptance: comparative analysis and governance implications
    Hess, David J.
    [J]. HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY, 2014, 16 (03) : 243 - 258
  • [9] Better deployments come with acceptance: an investigation of factors driving consumers’ acceptance of smart meters
    Gumz J.
    Fettermann D.C.
    [J]. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, 2023, 10 (02): : 23 - 35
  • [10] Smart grid customers' acceptance and engagement: An overview
    Ellabban, Omar
    Abu-Rub, Haitham
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 65 : 1285 - 1298