Compositional verification of a multi-agent system for one-to-many negotiation

被引:11
|
作者
Brazier, FMT
Cornelissen, F
Gustavsson, R
Jonker, CM
Lindeberg, O
Polak, B
Treur, J
机构
[1] Free Univ Amsterdam, Dept Artificial Intelligence, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Karlskrona Ronneby, Dept Comp Sci, Karlskrona, Sweden
关键词
compositional; verification; multi-agent system; negotiation;
D O I
10.1023/B:APIN.0000013334.33853.0c
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Verification of multi-agent systems hardly occurs in design practice. One of the difficulties is that required properties for a multi-agent system usually refer to multi-agent behaviour which has nontrivial dynamics. To constrain these multi-agent behavioural dynamics, often a form of organisational structure is used, for example, for negotiating agents, by following strict protocols. The claim is that these negotiation protocols entail a structured process that is manageable with respect to analysis, design and execution of such a multi-agent system. In this paper this is shown by a case study: verification of a multi-agent system for one-to-many negotiation in the domain of load balancing of electricity use. A compositional verification method for multi-agent systems is applied that allows to (1) logically relate dynamic properties of the multi-agent system as a whole to dynamic properties of agents, and (2) logically relate dynamic properties of agents to properties of their subcomponents. Given that properties of these subcomponents can be verified by more standard methods, these logical relationships provide proofs of the dynamic properties of the multi-agent system as a whole.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 117
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Compositional Verification of a Multi-Agent System for One-to-Many Negotiation
    Frances M.T. Brazier
    Frank Cornelissen
    Rune Gustavsson
    Catholijn M. Jonker
    Olle Lindeberg
    Bianca Polak
    Jan Treur
    [J]. Applied Intelligence, 2004, 20 : 95 - 117
  • [2] Compositional design and verification of a multi-agent system for one-to-many negotiation
    Brazier, F
    Cornelissen, F
    Gustavsson, R
    Jonker, CM
    Lindeberg, O
    Polak, B
    Treur, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 49 - 56
  • [3] Open, Dynamic and Continuous One-to-Many Negotiation System
    Sun, Tianhao
    Zhu, Qingsheng
    Li, Shuangqing
    Zhou, Mingqiang
    [J]. 2007 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIO-INSPIRED COMPUTING: THEORIES AND APPLICATIONS, 2007, : 87 - 93
  • [4] A Study of One-to-Many Multi-Attribute Automated Negotiation
    Wu, Yuying
    Zhang, Lixing
    Yan, Feng
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN THE CHANGING ERA: THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2009, : 270 - 276
  • [5] An Approach to One-to-Many Concurrent Negotiation
    Mansour, Khalid
    Kowalczyk, Ryszard
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2015, 24 (01) : 45 - 66
  • [6] ON COORDINATING STRATEGY FOR ONE-TO-MANY NEGOTIATION
    Yao, Yonglei
    Ma, Li
    [J]. CIICT 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF CHINA-IRELAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES 2008, 2008, : 160 - 164
  • [7] An Approach to One-to-Many Concurrent Negotiation
    Khalid Mansour
    Ryszard Kowalczyk
    [J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2015, 24 : 45 - 66
  • [8] One-one bargaining negotiation process in multi-agent system
    Liu, DY
    Chen, JZ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON CSCW IN DESIGN, 1996, : 150 - 159
  • [9] Qualitative One-to-Many Multi-Issue Negotiation: Approximating the QVA
    Hindriks, Koen V.
    Tykhonov, Dmytro
    de Weerdt, Mathijs M.
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2012, 21 (01) : 49 - 77
  • [10] Qualitative One-to-Many Multi-Issue Negotiation: Approximating the QVA
    Koen V. Hindriks
    Dmytro Tykhonov
    Mathijs M. de Weerdt
    [J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2012, 21 : 49 - 77