Appraising groundwater potential zones using geospatial and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques in Andasa-Tul watershed, Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia

被引:16
|
作者
Anteneh, Zelalem Leyew [1 ]
Alemu, Melkamu Meseret [1 ,2 ]
Bawoke, Getnet Taye [1 ]
Kehali, Alebachew Tareke [1 ]
Fenta, Mulugeta Chanie [1 ]
Desta, Minyahl Teferi [1 ]
机构
[1] Bahir Dar Univ, Sch Earth Sci, Dept Geol, POB 79, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
[2] Bahir Dar Univ, Geospatial Data & Technol Ctr GDTC, POB 79, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
关键词
Groundwater potential; AHP; Thematic layer; Sensitivity analysis; Andasa-Tul; Upper Blue Nile; HIERARCHY PROCESS; GIS; DELINEATION; RECHARGE; DISTRICT; SITES; PLAIN; AHP;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-021-10083-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An integrated approach of remote sensing, geographic information system and multicriteria decision analysis of analytical hierarchical process (AHP) were applied to delineate groundwater potential (GWP) zones in Andasa-Tul watershed, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia with an area of 1872 km(2). Nine GWP influencing thematic layers comprising lithology, lineament density, geomorphology, slope, soil, drainage density, land use/land cover, rainfall and depth to groundwater level prepared from conventional and satellite data were used. The thematic layers and classes within them were given scale values based on literature and experts' decision by using Satty's AHP. The thematic layers have been integrated via their weights/rates using weighted overlay spatial function tool of ArcGIS to provide GWP map. The result shows that GWP map comprises 250.8 km(2) (13.4%) very good, 132.9 km(2) (7.1%) good, 441.8 km(2) (23.6%) moderate, 662.7 km(2) (35.4%) poor and 383.8 km(2) (20.5%) very poor zones. Validation of the GWP map with existing boreholes and springs yield shows 83.8% agreement indicating good accuracy of the method. The map removal sensitivity analysis result reveals that GWP is more sensitive to lithology (mean variation index, 1.92%) and less sensitive to geomorphology (mean variation index, 0.59%). Similarly, from the single layer sensitivity analysis, lithology and slope are found to be more effective parameters, whereas rainfall and depth to groundwater level are less effective variables. The generated GWP map in the study region can be used as important guideline for locating GWP areas for further exploration, planning and management of the groundwater resources.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Appraising groundwater potential zones using geospatial and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques in Andasa-Tul watershed, Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia
    Zelalem Leyew Anteneh
    Melkamu Meseret Alemu
    Getnet Taye Bawoke
    Alebachew Tareke Kehali
    Mulugeta Chanie Fenta
    Minyahl Teferi Desta
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2022, 81
  • [2] Groundwater potential assessment in the Blue Nile River catchment, Ethiopia, using geospatial and multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Tamesgen, Yohanis
    Atlabachew, Abunu
    Jothimani, Muralitharan
    [J]. HELIYON, 2023, 9 (06)
  • [3] Hydrogeochemical and isotopic signatures of groundwater in the Andasa watershed, Upper Blue Nile basin, Northwestern Ethiopia
    Bawoke, Getnet Taye
    Anteneh, Zelalem Leyew
    Kehali, Alebachew Tareke
    Mohammedyasin, Mohammed Seid
    Wudie, Gashaw
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2019, 160
  • [4] RS and GIS analysis of the groundwater potential zones in the Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia
    Duguma, Timketa Adula
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2023, 46
  • [5] Multi-criteria decision process to identify groundwater potential zones using geospatial tools in the Arghandab river basin, Afghanistan
    Asadullah Farahmand
    Mohammad Salem Hussaini
    Hussain Ali Jawadi
    Manuel Abrunhosa
    Brian F. Thomas
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2023, 82
  • [6] Multi-criteria decision process to identify groundwater potential zones using geospatial tools in the Arghandab river basin, Afghanistan
    Farahmand, Asadullah
    Hussaini, Mohammad Salem
    Jawadi, Hussain Ali
    Abrunhosa, Manuel
    Thomas, Brian F.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2023, 82 (14)
  • [7] Holistic approach of GIS based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and WetSpass models to evaluate groundwater potential in Gelana watershed of Ethiopia
    Niway, Wondesen Fikade
    Molla, Dagnachew Daniel
    Lohani, Tarun Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GROUNDWATER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (02): : 138 - 152
  • [8] A triangulation approach for groundwater potential evaluation using geospatial technology and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in Edo State, Nigeria
    Ozegin, Kesyton Oyamenda
    Ilugbo, Stephen Olubusola
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2024, 209
  • [9] Delineation of Groundwater Potential Zones of Coastal Groundwater Basin Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Technique
    Uday Mandal
    Satiprasad Sahoo
    Selva Balaji Munusamy
    Anirban Dhar
    Sudhindra N. Panda
    Amlanjyoti Kar
    Prasanta K. Mishra
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2016, 30 : 4293 - 4310
  • [10] Delineation of Groundwater Potential Zones of Coastal Groundwater Basin Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Technique
    Mandal, Uday
    Sahoo, Satiprasad
    Munusamy, Selva Balaji
    Dhar, Anirban
    Panda, Sudhindra N.
    Kar, Amlanjyoti
    Mishra, Prasanta K.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (12) : 4293 - 4310