Finalized paper for The Pacific Review special issue "China debates its global role" grown from within: Building a Chinese School of International Relations

被引:20
|
作者
Ren, Xiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Inst Int Studies, Int Polit, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
PACIFIC REVIEW | 2020年 / 33卷 / 3-4期
关键词
China; Chinese school; emergence; four theories; IR;
D O I
10.1080/09512748.2020.1728573
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Over the years, this author has been involved in the 'Chinese school of International Relations (IR)' debate. In this article I try to reflect on these discussions or debates from which some insights can be retrieved to inform future research and further growth of a Chinese School of IR. Should a Chinese school be set as the goal? If so, how should this be pursued? This debate and the relevant efforts have proved to be a promising movement in the Chinese IR community, demonstrating that a Chinese school of IR is inevitable and it actually is evolving. A theory is a generalization or cluster of generalizations. This article argues that from the 'Tsinghua approach', a 'moral realism' has sprung up. Qin Yaqin's theorizing is centered around relationality and has been productive. A theory of symbiosis in the world community is being developed by a group of Shanghai-based scholars, and a 'symbiosis school' has grown up. Overall, four distinct theories of Chinese origins, i.e., relational theory, moral realism, tianxia theory and gongsheng/symbiotic theory, have appeared. Thus, IR theory-building in China in the first two decades of the 21st century has rendered the question 'why there is no IR theory in China' obsolete.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 412
页数:27
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据