Randomized study of gefitinib versus pemetrexed as maintenance treatment in patients with advanced glandular non-small cell lung cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Yan-Hua [1 ]
Mei, Jing-Song [2 ]
Zhou, Juan [3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Jingzhou Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Jingzhou 434020, Hubei Province, Peoples R China
[2] Jingzhou Cent Hosp Thorac Surg, Jingzhou 434020, Peoples R China
[3] Jingzhou Cent Hosp, Jingzhou, Hubei Province, Peoples R China
关键词
Pemetrexed; gefitinib; non-small cell lung; cancer chemotherapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Gefitinib was compared with pemetrexed as maintenance therapy in Patients with Advanced Glandular Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, mainly regarding clinical effect and side effect. A randomized trial of pemetrexed as study group (500 mg/m(2), dl) versus gefitinib as the control group [250 mg on night 1, 250 mg on morning 2 (every day)] was conducted in 188 patients, 94 cases in each group with a therapy cycle of 21 days. In addition, the study group was also treated with folic acid, vitB12 and dexamethasone. Therapeutic effects and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared. Patients of two groups completed four cycles of chemotherapy mostly, and there was no complete remission (CR) case. The median-cycle of chemotherapy was 2 for the study group, and partial response(PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD) were observed in 28 (29.8%), 34 (36.2%), 32 (34.0%) cases respectively. The median-cycle was 3 for the control group, PR, SD and PD were observed in 17 (18.1%), 23 (24.5%), 54 (57.4%) cases respectively. The effective rates were 29.8% and 18.1% for pemetrexed (28 cases) and gefitinib (17 cases) respectively (P > 0.05). However, there was a statistically significant difference in disease control rates between the 2 groups (65.0% vs 42.6%; P < 0.05). Adverse reactions occurred in two groups were mainly mild adverse reactions of 1-2 degree, without renal failure. The study group and control group had three and five cases of mild infection respectively, without statistically significant difference. There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of rash and alopecia between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the number of cases with neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, gastrointestinal reactions and fatigue in the study group was lower than that of the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Considering the disease control rate and the tolerance of patients with advanced NSCLC, pemetrexed is strongly recommended to be used in clinical.
引用
收藏
页码:6242 / 6246
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized Phase II Study of Pemetrexed Versus Gefitinib in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
    Kim, Young Saing
    Cho, Eun Kyung
    Woo, Hyun Sun
    Hong, Junshik
    Ahn, Hee Kyung
    Park, Inkeun
    Sym, Sun Jin
    Kyung, Sun Young
    Kang, Shin Myung
    Park, Jeong-Woong
    Jeong, Sung Hwan
    Park, Jinny
    Lee, Jae Hoon
    Shin, Dong Bok
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 48 (01): : 80 - 87
  • [2] Randomized Phase II Study of Pemetrexed versus Gefitinib for Patients with Previously Treated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Hong, Junshik
    Kyung, Sun Young
    Lee, Sang Pyo
    Park, Jeong Woong
    Jung, Sung Hwan
    Sym, Sun Jin
    Park, Jinny
    Cho, Eun Kyung
    Shin, Dong Bok
    Lee, Jae Hoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 5 (12) : S401 - S401
  • [3] Pemetrexed for the maintenance treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
    Greenhalgh, J.
    McLeod, C.
    Bagust, A.
    Boland, A.
    Fleeman, N.
    Dundar, Y.
    Oyee, J.
    Dickson, R.
    Davis, H.
    Green, J.
    McKenna, E.
    Pearson, M.
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2010, 14 : 33 - 39
  • [4] PEMETREXED MAINTENANCE TREATMENT IN ADVANCED NON SQUAMOUS NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC)
    Megaiz, Ahlem
    Bousahba, Abdelkader
    Rabah, Aicha
    Zemmour, Amel
    Ahed-Messaoud, Malika
    Ghazli, Soumia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8 : S588 - S589
  • [5] Pemetrexed for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Fossella, FV
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2004, 31 (01) : 100 - 105
  • [6] Randomized phase II study of pemetrexed versus gefitinib in previously treated patients with advanced no small cell lung cancer
    Kim, Young Saing
    Cho, Eun Kyung
    Sym, Sun Jin
    Hong, Junshik
    Park, Lnkeun
    Ahn, Lee Kyung
    Park, Jeong Woong
    Jung, Sung Hwan
    Park, Jinny
    Lee, Jae Hoon
    Shin, Dong Bok
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [7] Tolerability of pemetrexed versus placebo as a maintenance therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Evidence from a large randomized study
    Zielinski, C. C.
    Yang, S.
    Santoro, A.
    Ramlau, R.
    Liepa, A. M.
    Peterson, P.
    Brodowicz, T.
    Madhavan, J.
    Franke, F. A.
    Cucevic, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (15)
  • [8] Study of Gefitinib and Pemetrexed as First-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutation
    An, Chaolun
    Zhang, Jiajun
    Chu, Hongjun
    Gu, Chunyan
    Xiao, Feng
    Zhu, Fengwei
    Lu, Rujian
    Shi, Hai
    Zhang, Hongfei
    Yi, Xin
    [J]. PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2016, 22 (04) : 763 - 768
  • [9] A retrospective study of maintenance pemetrexed in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer
    Oguh, L.
    Ranatunge, D.
    Lind, M.
    Ukadhyay, S.
    El-Mahdawi, N.
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2018, 115 : S30 - S30
  • [10] Gefitinib or Erlotinib in the Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
    Shao, Yu-Yun
    Lin, Chia-Chi
    Yang, Chih-Hsin
    [J]. DISCOVERY MEDICINE, 2010, 9 (49) : 538 - 545