Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance -: A comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography

被引:4
|
作者
Schwitter, J
Nanz, D
Kneifel, S
Bertschinger, K
Büchi, M
Knüsel, P
Marincek, B
Lüscher, T
von Schulthess, GK
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Div Cardiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Clin Nucl Med, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Diagnost Radiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
imaging; perfusion; heart diseases;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Monitoring contrast medium wash-in kinetics in hyperemic myocardium by magnetic resonance (MR) allows for the detection of stenosed coronary arteries. In this prospective study, the quality of a multislice MR approach with respect to the detection and sizing of compromised myocardium was determined and compared with positron emission tomography (PET) and quantitative coronary angiography. Methods and Results-A total of 48 patients and 18 healthy subjects were studied by MR using a multislice hybrid echo-planar pulse sequence for monitoring the myocardial first pass kinetics of gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid bismethylamide (Omniscan; 0.1 mmol/kg injected at 3 mL/s IV) during hyperemia (dipyridamole 0.56 mg/kg). Signal intensity upslope as a measure of myocardial perfusion was calculated in 32 sectors per heart from pixelwise parametric maps in the subendocardial layer and for full wall thickness. Before coronary angiography, coronary flow reserve (hyperemia induced by dipyridamole 0.56 mg/kg) was determined in corresponding sectors by N-13-ammonia PET. Receiver-operator characteristic analysis of subendocardial upslope data revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 91% and 94%, respectively, for the detection of coronary artery disease as defined by PET (mean coronary flow reserve minus 2SD of controls) and a sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 85%, respectively, in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography (diameter stenosis greater than or equal to 50%). The number of pathological sectors per patient on PET and MR studies correlated linearly (slope, 0.94, r=0.76; P<0.0001). Conclusions-The presented MR approach reliably identifies patients with coronary artery stenoses and provides information on the amount of compromised myocardium, even when perfusion abnormalities are confined to the subendocardial layer. This modality may qualify for its clinical application in the management of coronary artery disease.
引用
收藏
页码:2230 / 2235
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detection of coronary artery disease by first pass magnetic resonance perfusion imaging: a comparison with positron emission tomography and x-ray coronary angiography
    Schwitter, J
    Bertschinger, K
    Nanz, D
    Kneifel, S
    Buechi, M
    Amann, FW
    Luescher, TF
    Marincek, B
    von Schulthess, GK
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 : 571 - 571
  • [2] QUANTIFICATION OF ABSOLUTE MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: COMPARISON BETWEEN CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE AND POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY
    Morton, Geraint
    Chiribiri, Amedeo
    Ishida, Masaki
    Hussain, Shazia
    Schuster, Andreas
    Indermuehle, Andreas
    Perera, Divaka
    Hedstrom, Erik
    Barrington, Sally
    Nagel, Eike
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (13) : E1064 - E1064
  • [3] Myocardial perfusion assessed through CT coronary angiography: a comparison with positron emission tomography
    Coceani, M.
    Favilla, R.
    Coppini, G.
    Bianchi, M.
    Schlueter, M.
    Filidei, E.
    Mazzarisi, A.
    Neglia, D.
    Marraccini, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 : 152 - 153
  • [4] Clinical value of absolute myocardial perfusion by positron emission tomography in coronary artery disease
    Nakagawa, K
    Gould, LK
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (08) : 3525 - 3525
  • [5] The value of quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging with positron emission tomography in coronary artery disease
    Wijns, W
    Camici, PG
    [J]. HERZ, 1997, 22 (02) : 87 - 95
  • [6] Comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography for the diagnosis and localization of coronary artery disease
    Geraint Morton
    Masaki Ishida
    Amedeo Chiribiri
    Andreas Schuster
    Stacey Baker
    Shazia Hussain
    Divaka Perera
    Michael O'Doherty
    Sally Barrington
    Eike Nagel
    [J]. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 13 (Suppl 1)
  • [7] Cardiac Magnetic Resonance versus Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography for Detecting Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Ischemia: Comparison with Coronary Angiography
    Laspas, Fotios
    Pipikos, Theodoros
    Karatzis, Emmanouil
    Georgakopoulos, Nikolaos
    Prassopoulos, Vasileios
    Andreou, John
    Moulopoulos, Lia A.
    Chatziioannou, Achilleas
    Danias, Peter G.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (04)
  • [8] Assessment of coronary flow capacity by positron emission tomography in coronary artery disease
    Garcia-Cardenas, Mauricio
    Fernandez-Badillo, Valente
    Espejel-Guzman, Adrian
    Serrano-Roman, Javier
    Solorzano-Pinot, Enrique
    Hernandez-Sandoval, Salvador
    Alexanderson-Rosas, Erick
    Espinola-Zavaleta, Nilda
    [J]. ARCHIVOS DE CARDIOLOGIA DE MEXICO, 2023, 93 (04): : 490 - 492
  • [9] Prognostic Value of Combined Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Positron Emission Tomography Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
    Maaniitty, Teemu
    Soukka, Lida
    Saraste, Antti
    Uusitalo, Valtteri
    Ukkonen, Heikki
    Kajander, Sami
    Maki, Maija
    Bax, Jeroen
    Knuuti, Juhani
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2014, 130
  • [10] Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging with single photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography: a comparison with coronary angiography
    Lars Husmann
    Mischa Wiegand
    Ines Valenta
    Oliver Gaemperli
    Tiziano Schepis
    Patrick T. Siegrist
    Mehdi Namdar
    Christophe A. Wyss
    Hatem Alkadhi
    Philipp A. Kaufmann
    [J]. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2008, 24 : 511 - 518