LAND-USE AND LAND-COVER MAPPING USING A COMBINATION OF RADAR AND OPTICAL SENSORS IN RORAIMA - BRAZIL

被引:0
|
作者
Maffei Valero, Miguel A. [1 ]
Araujo, Wellington F. [2 ]
Melo, Valdinar F. [2 ]
Augusti, Mauricio L. [2 ]
Fernandes-Filho, Elpidio, I [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Roraima, Dept Soil & Agr Engn, Boa Vista, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Roraima, Postgrad Program Agron, Boa Vista, Parana, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Vicosa, Soil Dept, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
来源
ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA | 2022年 / 42卷 / 02期
关键词
Machine learning; Sentinel-1; Sentinel-2; Landsat; 8; Savanna;
D O I
10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v42n2e20210142/2022
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Land-use and land-cover (LULC) are important environmental properties of the Earth's surface. Satellite platforms and state-of-the-art algorithms enable the mapping of large areas, but they still need to be improved. This study aimed to compare free- and open-access images from radar and optical sensors, using the Google Earth Engine (TM) (GEE) for supervised classification of LULC for five municipalities in Roraima State, Brazil. Sentinel-1 (S1) scenes were used along with Landsat 8 (L8) and Sentinel-2 (S2) ones, resulting in five classification approaches S1 (SD), L8 (ODL), S2 (ODS), S1+L8 (SODL), and S1+S2 (SODS), with an auxiliary ALOS World 3D dataset (DEM approximate to 30m). Accuracy was assessed by an error matrix. The SD approach was significantly different (P <= 0.01) from the others using a mean F1-score of 0.80. ODL and ODS had barely perceptible differences (P <= 0.1), showing F1-scores of 0.95 and 0.92, respectively. When comparing ODL (F1=0.95) and SODL (F1=0.95) no difference was found (P > 0.1). However, by comparing ODS (F1=0.92) and SODS (F1=0.94), there was a significant classification improvement (P <= 0.05). In short, the approaches SODL and SODS had the best pixel-based supervised classification performance.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radar and optical data integration for land-use/land-cover mapping
    Haack, BN
    Herold, ND
    Bechdol, MA
    [J]. PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2000, 66 (06): : 709 - 716
  • [2] Radar and optical data integration for land-use/land-cover mapping
    [J]. 2000, ASPRS, Bethesda, MD, USA (66):
  • [3] Land-Use and Land-Cover Mapping Using a Gradable Classification Method
    Kitada, Keigo
    Fukuyama, Kaoru
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 4 (06) : 1544 - 1558
  • [4] LAND-USE LAND-COVER MAPPING FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
    BAKER, RD
    DESTEIGUER, JE
    GRANT, DE
    NEWTON, MJ
    [J]. PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 1979, 45 (05): : 661 - 668
  • [5] Remote sensing for mapping and monitoring land-cover and land-use change
    Treitz, P
    Rogan, J
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 2004, 61 : 267 - +
  • [6] Mapping the landslide susceptibility considering future land-use land-cover scenario
    Tyagi, Ankit
    Tiwari, Reet Kamal
    James, Naveen
    [J]. LANDSLIDES, 2023, 20 (01) : 65 - 76
  • [7] An assessment of the effectiveness of a rotation forest ensemble for land-use and land-cover mapping
    Kavzoglu, Taskin
    Colkesen, Ismail
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 34 (12) : 4224 - 4241
  • [8] Landscape approach for land-use/land-cover classification and mapping at different scales
    Milanova, E
    Alexeev, B
    Sennikova, M
    Kalutskova, N
    Solntsev, V
    [J]. Understanding Land-Use and Land-Cover Change in Global and Regional Context, 2005, : 233 - 247
  • [9] Mapping the landslide susceptibility considering future land-use land-cover scenario
    Ankit Tyagi
    Reet Kamal Tiwari
    Naveen James
    [J]. Landslides, 2023, 20 : 65 - 76
  • [10] LAND-USE AND LAND-COVER MAPPING AND CHANGE DETECTION IN TRIPURA USING SATELLITE LANDSAT DATA
    GAUTAM, NC
    CHENNAIAH, GC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1985, 6 (3-4) : 517 - 528