Are all real-world objects created equal? Estimating the "set-size" of the search target in visual working memory

被引:1
|
作者
Miuccio, Michael T. [1 ]
Zelinsky, Gregory J. [2 ,3 ]
Schmidt, Joseph [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Psychol, 4111 Pictor Lane Psychol Bldg,Rm 355, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Psychol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Comp Sci, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CDA; eye movements; proto-objects; real-world objects; set-size; visual search; VWM; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; MULTIPLE TARGETS; NEURAL MEASURES; FIXED-CAPACITY; GUIDED SEARCH; PROTO-OBJECTS; ATTENTION; STORAGE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/psyp.13998
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Are all real-world objects created equal? Visual search difficulty increases with the number of targets and as target-related visual working memory (VWM) load increases. Our goal was to investigate the load imposed by individual real-world objects held in VWM in the context of search. Measures of visual clutter attempt to quantify real-world set-size in the context of scenes. We applied one of these measures, the number of proto-objects, to individual real-world objects and used contralateral delay activity (CDA) to measure the resulting VWM load. The current study presented a real-world object as a target cue, followed by a delay where CDA was measured. This was followed by a four-object search array. We compared CDA and later search performance from target cues containing a high or low number of proto-objects. High proto-object target cues resulted in greater CDA, longer search RTs, target dwell times, and reduced search guidance, relative to low proto-object targets. These findings demonstrate that targets with more proto-objects result in a higher VWM load and reduced search performance. This shows that the number of proto-objects contained within individual objects produce set-size like effects in VWM and suggests proto-objects may be a viable unit of measure of real-world VWM load. Importantly, this demonstrates that not all real-world objects are created equal.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Comparison of set-size effects in visual search and memory.
    McLean, JE
    Palmer, J
    Loftus, GR
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (04) : 1729 - 1729
  • [2] Real-world spatial regularities affect visual working memory for objects
    Kaiser, Daniel
    Stein, Timo
    Peelen, Marius V.
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2015, 22 (06) : 1784 - 1790
  • [3] Real-world objects are not stored in holistic representations in visual working memory
    Markov, Yuri A.
    Utochkin, Igor S.
    Brady, Timothy F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2021, 21 (03): : 1 - 24
  • [4] Real-world spatial regularities affect visual working memory for objects
    Daniel Kaiser
    Timo Stein
    Marius V. Peelen
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2015, 22 : 1784 - 1790
  • [5] Visual search for complex objects: Set-size effects for faces, words and cars
    Hemstrom, Jennifer
    Albonico, Andrea
    Djouab, Sarra
    Barton, Jason J. S.
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 2019, 162 : 8 - 19
  • [6] Chunking in Visual Working Memory: Are Visual Features of Real-World Objects Stored in Chunks?
    Luo, Tianrui
    Tian, Mi
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2022, 129 (06) : 1641 - 1657
  • [7] Canonical Visual Size for Real-World Objects
    Konkle, Talia
    Oliva, Aude
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2011, 37 (01) : 23 - 37
  • [8] Independent effects of perceptual set-size and VWM load on target discriminability in visual search
    Barrett, D. J. K.
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 2014, 43 (01) : 94 - 94
  • [9] The Role of Color in Search Templates for Real-world Target Objects
    Nako, Rebecca
    Smith, Tim J.
    Eimer, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 28 (11) : 1714 - 1727
  • [10] Effects of pre-cueing the target location on the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search
    Carrasco, M
    Yeshurun, Y
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1996, 37 (03) : 1381 - 1381