The Static-99R Is Not Valid For Women: Predictive Validity in 739 Females Who Have Sexually Offended

被引:13
|
作者
Marshall, Ethan [1 ]
Miller, Holly A. [1 ]
Cortoni, Franca [2 ]
Helmus, L. Maaike [3 ]
机构
[1] Sam Houston State Univ, Huntsville, TX 77341 USA
[2] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Simon Fraser Univ, Burnaby, BC, Canada
关键词
female sexual offenders; sexual recidivism; risk assessment; Static-99R; prediction; RECIDIVISM RATES; SEX OFFENDERS; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; RISK ASSESSMENTS; STATIC-2002R; ACCURACY; SAMPLE; METAANALYSIS; PATTERNS; PRIMER;
D O I
10.1177/1079063220940303
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Although many instruments have been validated to assess risk of sexual recidivism among men, no similar tool exists for women who have sexually offended. As a result, some jurisdictions use male-based instruments to assess women despite the lack of validation research examining the predictive utility for this subgroup. This study examined the utility of the Static-99R in predicting sexual recidivism among women. Based on a sample of 739 women convicted of sexual offenses in Texas, findings show that the total score was not significantly associated with sexual recidivism. When looking at individual items, other than a history of prior sexual offenses and noncontact sexual offenses, no item of the Static-99R was significantly associated with sexual recidivism among women. Furthermore, only three items (female victims/solo offender, 4+ sentencing dates, and having not lived with a romantic other for 2+ years) were significantly associated with nonsexual recidivism. These findings indicate that the Static-99R is not suitable to assess risk of recidivism among women convicted of sexual offenses.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 653
页数:23
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Predictive Validity of the Static-99R in Romania
    Toma, Roxana Andreea
    Kube, Silvia
    Hurezan, Liliana
    Banse, Rainer
    [J]. CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2022, 49 (09) : 1276 - 1294
  • [2] Predictive Validity of the Static-99 and Static-99R in Switzerland
    Goncalves, Leonel C.
    Gerth, Juliane
    Rossegger, Astrid
    Noll, Thomas
    Endrass, Jerome
    [J]. SEXUAL ABUSE-A JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 32 (02) : 203 - 219
  • [3] Predictive validity of the Static-99R and its dimensions
    Brouillette-Alarie, Sebastien
    Proulx, Jean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL AGGRESSION, 2013, 19 (03) : 311 - 328
  • [4] Adolescents Who Have Sexually Offended: Is Phallometry Valid?
    Rice, Marnie E.
    Harris, Grant T.
    Lang, Carol
    Chaplin, Terry C.
    [J]. SEXUAL ABUSE-A JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 24 (02) : 133 - 152
  • [5] The Predictive Validity of the Static-99, Static-99R, and Static-2002/R: Which One to Use?
    Reeves, Sophie G.
    Ogloff, James R. P.
    Simmons, Melanie
    [J]. SEXUAL ABUSE-A JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 30 (08) : 887 - 907
  • [6] Examining the Predictive Validity of the Static-99R on Native American Sex Offenders
    Myer, Andrew J.
    [J]. JUSTICE EVALUATION JOURNAL, 2019, 2 (02) : 181 - 195
  • [7] Does Consideration of Psychopathy and Sexual Deviance Add to the Predictive Validity of the Static-99R?
    Looman, Jan
    Morphett, Nicola A. C.
    Abracen, Jeff
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2013, 57 (08) : 939 - 965
  • [8] Examining the Utility of the LSI-R in a Sample of Women who have Sexually Offended
    Marshall, Ethan A.
    Miller, Holly A.
    Grubb, Leah
    [J]. CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2022, 49 (03) : 311 - 329
  • [9] Reliability and validity of the Static-99R in sex offenders with intellectual disabilities
    Pouls, Claudia
    Jeandarme, Inge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES AND OFFENDING BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 13 (01) : 20 - 31
  • [10] Predictive Validity of Adult Risk Assessment Tools With Juveniles Who Offended Sexually
    Ralston, Christopher A.
    Epperson, Douglas L.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2013, 25 (03) : 905 - 916