Evolution of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Guidelines

被引:25
|
作者
Han, Henry [1 ,2 ]
Chao, Howard [1 ,2 ]
Guerra, Andres [1 ,2 ]
Sosa, Alan [1 ,2 ]
Christopoulos, Georgios [1 ,2 ]
Christakopoulos, Georgios E. [1 ,2 ]
Rangan, Bavana V. [1 ,2 ]
Maragkoudakis, Spyros
Jneid, Hani [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Banerjee, Subhash [1 ,2 ]
Brilakis, Emmanouil S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] VA North Texas Healthcare Syst, Dallas, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX 75216 USA
[3] Univ Heraklion, Iraklion, Greece
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, Houston, TX USA
关键词
cardiovascular diseases; clinical guidelines; evolution; scientific evidence; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; ATHEROSCLEROTIC VASCULAR-DISEASE; ACCF/AHA FOCUSED UPDATE; TASK-FORCE; SECONDARY PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT; COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.050
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) have been developing clinical guidelines to assist practicing clinicians. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to evaluate changes in ACC/AHA guideline recommendations between 2008 and 2014. METHODS The previous and current ACC/AHA guideline documents that were updated between 2008 and June 2014 were compared to determine changes in Class of Recommendation (COR) and Level of Evidence (LOE). Each recommendation was classified as new, dropped, revised, or unchanged, and the changes in evidence were examined. RESULTS During the study period, 11 guideline documents (9 disease based and 2 interventional procedure based) were updated. The total number of recommendations decreased from 2,067 to 1,869 (321 fewer recommendations in disease-based guidelines and 123 additional recommendations in interventional procedure-based guidelines). The recommendation class distribution of the updated guidelines was 50.1% Class I (previously 50.8%), 39.4% Class II (previously 35.4%), and 10.4% Class III (previously 13.8%) (p = 0.001). The LOE distribution among updated versions was 15.0% for LOE: A (previously 13.3%), 50.8% for LOE: B (previously 41.4%), and 34.2% for LOE C (previously 45.3%) (p < 0.001). Among all guidelines, 859 recommendations were new, 1,339 were dropped, 881 were unchanged in COR and LOE, and 129 were revised. Of the revised guidelines, 75 recommendations had an increase in LOE (the majority from LOE: C to LOE: B); 34 recommendations had a decrease in LOE; and 20 recommendations had class changes. LOE increases were justified by introduction of new randomized controlled trials, new studies, and new meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS The ACC/AHA guideline recommendations are undergoing significant changes, becoming more evidence based and scientifically robust with a tendency to exclude recommendations with insufficient scientific evidence. (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:2726 / 2734
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evolution of Value in American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Practice Guidelines
    Luviano, Andrea
    Pandya, Ankur
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2023, 16 (11): : E010086
  • [2] Evolution of the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association Cardiology Clinical Practice Guidelines: A 10-Year Assessment
    DuBose-Briski, Victoria
    Yao, Xiaoxi
    Dunlay, Shannon M.
    Dhruva, Sanket S.
    Ross, Joseph S.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Noseworthy, Peter A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2019, 8 (19):
  • [3] EVOLUTION OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY AND THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION CARDIOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES: A 10-YEAR ASSESSMENT
    Dubose-Briski, Victoria
    Yao, Xiaoxi
    Dunlay, Shannon
    Dhruva, Sanket
    Ross, Joseph
    Shah, Nilay
    Noseworthy, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 3028 - 3028
  • [4] Implementation of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines on Hypertension in Clinical Practice
    Mahato, Poonam
    Ganesh, Rajan
    Hanumanthu, Balaram Krishna
    Rana, Yesha Patel
    Chan, Jin Ei
    Alam, Tahmina
    Misra, Deepika
    [J]. OCHSNER JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (03): : 254 - 260
  • [5] Underuse of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines in hemodialysis patients
    Wolff Gowdak, Luis Henrique
    Arantes, Rodolfo Leite
    de Paula, Flavio Jota
    Krieger, Eduardo M.
    Galvao De Lima, Jose Jayme
    [J]. RENAL FAILURE, 2007, 29 (05) : 559 - 565
  • [6] Compliance with the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines for coronary angiography in everyday clinical practice
    Hallani, H
    Hopkins, AP
    Lo, ST
    Juergens, CP
    Nguyen-Do, P
    Leung, DY
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (17) : 459 - 459
  • [7] Implications of the New 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for Hypertension
    Aronow, Wilbert S.
    [J]. MINERVA CARDIOANGIOLOGICA, 2019, 67 (05): : 399 - 410
  • [8] Perspectives on the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for the Prevention of Infective Endocarditis
    Bach, David S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (20) : 1852 - 1854
  • [10] American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Competence Statement on Echocardiography -: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians -: American Society of Internal Medicine Task Force on Clinical Competence
    Quiñones, MA
    Douglas, PS
    Foster, E
    Gorcsan, J
    Lewis, JF
    Pearlman, AS
    Rychik, J
    Salcedo, EE
    Seward, JB
    Stevenson, JG
    Thys, DM
    Weitz, HH
    Zoghbi, WA
    Creager, MA
    Winters, WL
    Elnicki, M
    Hirshfeld, JW
    Lorell, BH
    Rodgers, GP
    Tracy, CM
    Weitz, HH
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2003, 107 (07) : 1068 - 1089