Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles

被引:171
|
作者
Frattarelli, John L. [1 ]
Miller, Kathleen A. [1 ]
Miller, Bradley T. [2 ]
Elkind-Hirsch, Karen [1 ]
Scott, Richard T., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Reprod Med Associates New Jersey, Somerset, NJ 08873 USA
[2] Reprod Med Associates Michigan, Troy, MI USA
关键词
male age; in vitro fertilization; male factor infertility; male reproductive potential; semen analysis; embryo development; ICSI; donor oocyte; blastocyst; pregnancy rates;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.009
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether male age influences embryo development and reproductive potential in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Design: Retrospective cohort analysis. Setting: Private IVF center. Patient(s): One thousand twenty-three male partners participating in anonymous oocyte donation cycles. Intervention(s): Infertile couples undergoing 1,023 anonymous oocyte donation cycles. Main Outcome Measure(s): Live birth rate. Result(s): A significant increase in pregnancy loss, decrease in live birth, rate, and decrease in blastocyst formation rate were noted in men >50 years of age. There was no significant difference in implantation rate, pregnancy rate, or early embryo development through the cleavage stage (demonstrated by fertilization rate, embryo cleavage rate, percentage of nonfertilized or polyspermic embryos, rate of embryo arrest, or seven or more cell embryo development on day 3). Men >= 45 years of age had significantly more semen volume and more motile sperm than men >45 years of age. There was no significant change in sperm morphology or concentration. Conclusion(s): After controlling for female age with use of the donor oocyte model, male age >50 years significantly affected pregnancy outcomes and blastocyst formation rates. Semen volume and total motility decreased with increasing male age. initial embryo morphology through the cleavage stage was not affected.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 103
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Male Age Negatively Impacts Embryo Development and Reproductive Outcome in Donor Oocyte Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles
    Frattarelli, J. L.
    Miller, K. A.
    Miller, B. T.
    Elkind-Hirsch, K.
    Scott, R. T., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (02): : 758 - 758
  • [2] Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte art cycles.
    Frattarelli, J. L.
    Miller, K. A.
    Miller, B. T.
    Elkind-Hirsch, K.
    Scott, R. T.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 : S76 - S76
  • [3] Male age doesn't impacts embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy rate in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles
    Costa Lopes, J. R.
    dos Santos, J. Mendes
    Silva Lima, S. Portugal
    Silva Souza, S. Portugal
    Pereira, T. Rodrigues
    Barguil Brasileiro, J. P.
    Pina, H.
    Lessa, M. L.
    Soares, M. Genovese
    Lopes, V. Medina
    Ribeiro, C. G.
    Adami, K.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 : I238 - I238
  • [4] Impact of male age on the outcome of assisted reproductive technology cycles using donor oocytes
    Duran, E. H.
    Dowling-Lacey, D.
    Bocca, S.
    Stadtmauer, L.
    Oehninger, S.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2010, 20 (06) : 848 - 856
  • [5] ADVANCED PATERNAL AGE NEGATIVELY IMPACTS REPRODUCTIVE OUTCOME
    Katz-Jaffe, M.
    Crocker, J.
    Parks, J.
    Schoolcraft, W.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (03) : S1 - S1
  • [6] Associations between male reproductive characteristics and the outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART)
    Liu, Zhangshun
    Shi, Xiaohong
    Wang, Lihong
    Yang, Yan
    Fu, Qiang
    Tao, Minfang
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE REPORTS, 2017, 37
  • [7] Comparison of Embryo Transfer Techniques in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Cycles
    Ligon, Sarah
    Chaffin, Kimberly Ann
    Pier, Bruce D.
    Levy, Gary
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 127S - 127S
  • [8] Effects of male age on semen quality and embryo development in assisted reproductive techniques.
    Ozsait, B.
    Bulgurcuoglu, S.
    Sen, N.
    Can, G.
    Serdaroglu, H.
    Atter, E.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 : S264 - S265
  • [9] Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013
    Crawford, Sara
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Kawwass, Jennifer F.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 107 (01) : 110 - 118
  • [10] Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation in assisted reproductive technology: past achievements and current challenges 
    Casciani, Valentina
    Monseur, Brent
    Cimadomo, Danilo
    Alvero, Ruben
    Rienzi, Laura
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 120 (03) : 506 - 520