Do postage stamps versus pre-paid envelopes increase responses to patient mail surveys? A randomised controlled trial

被引:12
|
作者
Lavelle, Katrina [1 ]
Todd, Chris [1 ]
Campbell, Malcolm [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Social Work, Oxford M13 9PL, England
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-8-113
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Studies largely from the market research field suggest that the inclusion of a stamped addressed envelope, rather than a pre-paid business reply, increases the response rate to mail surveys. The evidence that this is also the case regarding patient mail surveys is limited. Methods: The aim of this study is to investigate whether stamped addressed envelopes increase response rates to patient mail surveys compared to pre-paid business reply envelopes and compare the relative costs. A sample of 477 initial non-responders to a mail survey of patients attending breast clinics in Greater Manchester between 1/10/2002 - 31/7/2003 were entered into the trial: 239 were randomly allocated to receive a stamped envelope and 238 to receive a pre-paid envelope in with their reminder surveys. Overall cost and per item returned were calculated. Results: The response to the stamped envelope group was 31.8% (95% CI: 25.9% - 37.7%) compared to 26.9% (21.3% -32.5%) for the pre-paid group. The difference (4.9% 95% CI: - 3.3% - 13.1%) is not significant at alpha = 0.05 (chi(2) = 1.39; 2 tailed test, d.f. = 1; P = 0.239). The stamped envelopes were cheaper in terms of cost per returned item (1.20) pound than the pre-paid envelopes (1.67) pound. However if the set up cost for the licence to use the pre-paid service is excluded, the cost of the stamped envelopes is more expensive than pre-paid returns (1.20 pound versus 0.73) pound. Conclusion: Compared with pre-paid business replies, stamped envelopes did not produce a statistically significant increase in response rate to this patient survey. However, the response gain of the stamped strategy (4.9%) is similar to that demonstrated in a Cochrane review (5.3%) of strategies to increase response to general mail surveys. Further studies and meta analyses of patient responses to mail surveys via stamped versus pre-paid envelopes are needed with sufficient power to detect response gains of this magnitude in a patient population.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Do postage stamps versus pre-paid envelopes increase responses to patient mail surveys? A randomised controlled trial
    Katrina Lavelle
    Chris Todd
    Malcolm Campbell
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 8
  • [2] Do postage-stamps increase response rates to postal surveys? A randomized controlled trial
    Harrison, RA
    Holt, D
    Elton, PJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (04) : 872 - 874
  • [3] Do animation videos increase participation in national health surveys? A randomised controlled trial
    Anne Illemann Christensen
    Cathrine Juel Lau
    Hanne Stald Poulsen
    Ola Ekholm
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 23
  • [4] Do animation videos increase participation in national health surveys? A randomised controlled trial
    Christensen, Anne Illemann
    Lau, Cathrine Juel
    Poulsen, Hanne Stald
    Ekholm, Ola
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [5] Mixed-mode versus paper surveys for patient-reported outcomes after critical illness: A randomised controlled trial
    Wong, Hao Z.
    Brusseleers, Maarten
    Hall, Kelly A.
    Maiden, Matthew J.
    Chapple, Lee-anne S.
    Chapman, Marianne J.
    Hodgson, Carol L.
    Gluck, Samuel
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 35 (03) : 286 - 293
  • [6] Do personalised e-mail invitations increase the response rates of breast cancer survivors invited to participate in a web-based behaviour change intervention? A quasi-randomised 2-arm controlled trial
    Short, Camille E.
    Rebar, Amanda L.
    Vandelanotte, Corneel
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [7] Do personalised e-mail invitations increase the response rates of breast cancer survivors invited to participate in a web-based behaviour change intervention? A quasi-randomised 2-arm controlled trial
    Camille E. Short
    Amanda L. Rebar
    Corneel Vandelanotte
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15
  • [8] Erratum to: Do personalised e-mail invitations increase the response rates of breast cancer survivors invited to participate in a web-based behaviour change intervention? A quasi-randomised 2-arm controlled trial
    Camille E. Short
    Amanda L. Rebar
    Corneel Vandelanotte
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15
  • [9] Do personalised e-mail invitations increase the response rates of breast cancer survivors invited to participate in a web-based behaviour change intervention? A quasi-randomised 2-arm controlled trial (vol 15, 66, 2015)
    Short, Camille E.
    Rebar, Amanda L.
    Vandelanotte, Corneel
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [10] Accuracy of midface advancement using patient -specific surgical guides and pre -bent plates versus conventional interocclusal wafers and conventional plate fixation in quadrangular Le Forte II osteotomy. A randomised controlled trial
    Omara, M.
    Ali, S.
    Ahmed, M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 59 (10): : 1253 - 1258