How Patients View Lung Cancer Screening The Role of Uncertainty in Medical Decision Making

被引:37
|
作者
Schapira, Marilyn M. [1 ,6 ]
Aggarwal, Charu [2 ]
Akers, Scott [4 ,7 ]
Aysola, Jaya [1 ]
Imbert, Diana [1 ]
Langer, Corey [2 ]
Simone, Charlie B., II [5 ]
Strittmatter, Emily [1 ]
Vachani, Anil [3 ,7 ]
Fraenkel, Liana [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Div Pulm Allergy & Crit Care, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Ctr Hlth Equ Res & Promot, Philadelphia, PA USA
[7] Michael J Crescenz Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[8] Vet Affairs Connecticut Healthcare Syst, West Haven, CT USA
[9] Yale Univ, Dept Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
lung cancer screening; communication; uncertainty; ambiguity; decision making; THORACIC-SURGERY GUIDELINES; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY SCANS; PATIENTS PERSPECTIVES; AMERICAN ASSOCIATION; PERCEIVED AMBIGUITY; RISK COMMUNICATION; TASK-FORCE; HARMS; STATISTICS; AVERSION;
D O I
10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-290OC
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale: Radiographic lung cancer screening guidelines and coverage requirements warrant a shared decision-making process. Guidance is needed regarding how to conduct shared decision making effectively. A useful organizing theme should include consideration of a patient's response to and tolerance of uncertainty associated with lung cancer screening. Objectives: The objectives of this study are to: (1) describe how patients respond to specific categories of uncertainty in the context of lung cancer screening, and (2) inform strategies for addressing concerns about uncertainty as part of the shared decision making. Methods: We performed two series of structured interviews on participants in a convenience sample of current or former cigarette smokers recruited from primary care and pulmonary practices in Philadelphia. An interview guide included prompts related to benefits, harms, and responses to general and specific types of uncertainty (stochastic, statistical, and evidentiary) associated with lung cancer screening. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and independently coded by two investigators. An inductive analysis was conducted, and major themes were identified. Measurements and Main Results: Twenty-two adults participated in the study. Sixty-eight percent were men, 72% were black or African American, and 50% met U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria for lung cancer screening. The primary themes to emerge from our study were: (1) the desire to decrease uncertainty may motivate lung cancer screening decisions; (2) uncertainty is an attribute of health states that impacts how patients weigh benefits and harms of lung cancer screening; (3) patient understanding and tolerance of uncertainty varies across stochastic, statistical, and evidentiary uncertainty; and (4) provider-patient communication may mitigate intolerance of uncertainty in the context of lung cancer screening. Conclusions: A systematic approach to understanding and addressing patients' concerns about uncertainty in the context of lung cancer screening can guide a patient-centered approach to shared decision making. The results of this study can inform provider-patient communication strategies regarding the decision to perform radiographic lung cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页码:1969 / 1976
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision Making for Lung Cancer Screening: How Well Are We "Sharing"?
    Nishi, S. P. E.
    Crocker, L.
    Lowenstein, L.
    Godoy, M.
    Mendoza, T.
    Volk, R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 199
  • [2] Uncertainty of Physicians and Patients in Medical Decision Making
    Dhawale, Tejaswini
    Steuten, Lotte M.
    Deeg, H. Joachim
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 23 (06) : 865 - 869
  • [3] Uncertainty and patients' preferred role in decision making
    Fraenkel, Liana
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2011, 82 (01) : 130 - 132
  • [4] Medical Decision Making: How Patients Choose
    Pauker, Stephen G.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2010, 30 : 8S - 10S
  • [5] Importance of Individualized Decision Making for Lung Cancer Screening
    Black, William C.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (01) : 225 - 226
  • [6] Shared Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening
    Nishi, Shawn P. E.
    Lowenstein, Lisa M.
    Mendoza, Tito R.
    Lopez, Maria A.
    Crocker, Laura C.
    Sepucha, Karen
    Niu, Jiangong
    Volk, Robert J.
    [J]. CHEST, 2021, 160 (01) : 330 - 340
  • [7] Evaluating Shared Decision Making for Lung Cancer Screening
    Brenner, Alison T.
    Malo, Ted L.
    Margolis, Marjorie
    Lafata, Jennifer Elston
    James, Shynah
    Vu, Maihan B.
    Reuland, Daniel S.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 178 (10) : 1311 - 1316
  • [8] Implications of smoking for quality of life and medical decision making in lung cancer patients
    Rowland, C.
    Eiser, C.
    Rowe, R.
    Danson, S.
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2012, 75 : S44 - S45
  • [9] Shared Medical Decision Making in Lung Cancer Screening: Experienced versus Descriptive Risk Formats
    Fraenkel, Liana
    Peters, Ellen
    Tyra, Shea
    Oelberg, David
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2016, 36 (04) : 518 - 525
  • [10] Decision Making in Lung Cancer - How Applicable are the Guidelines?
    Vinod, S. K.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 27 (02) : 125 - 131