Implications of laboratory diagnosis on brucellosis therapy

被引:14
|
作者
Al Dahouk, Sascha [1 ,2 ]
Noeckler, Karsten [3 ]
机构
[1] Fed Inst Risk Assessment Hyg & Microbiol, D-12277 Berlin, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Dept Internal Med 3, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[3] Fed Inst Risk Assessment Diagnost Genet & Pathoge, D-12277 Berlin, Germany
关键词
antibiotic therapy; Brucella; culture; human brucellosis; laboratory diagnosis; molecular detection; serologic tests; REAL-TIME PCR; POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION; FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION ASSAY; IMMUNOGLOBULIN-G; RAPID DIAGNOSIS; BLOOD CULTURES; SERUM SAMPLES; PRESUMPTIVE DIAGNOSIS; CONVENTIONAL METHODS; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.1586/ERI.11.55
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Brucellosis is a worldwide zoonosis with a huge economic impact on animal husbandry and public health. The diagnosis of human brucellosis can be protracted because the disease primarily presents as fever of unknown origin with unspecific clinical signs and symptoms. The isolation rate of the fastidious etiologic agent from blood cultures is low, and therefore laboratory diagnosis is mainly based on serologic and molecular testing. However, seronegative brucellosis patients have been described, and antibody titers of diagnostic significance are difficult to define. Whether the molecular detection of Brucella DNA in clinical samples should be followed by long-term antibiotic treatment or not is also a matter of debate. The aim of this article is to review and discuss the implications of laboratory test results in the diagnosis of human brucellosis on disease therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 845
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条