Economic Tradeoffs of Managing for Timber Production or Wildlife Habitat

被引:16
|
作者
Davis, Phillip Brock [1 ]
Munn, Ian A. [1 ]
Henderson, James E. [1 ]
Strickland, Bronson K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Forestry, Box 9680, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Aquaculture, Box 9680, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 2017年 / 81卷 / 08期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Colinus virginianus; economic tradeoffs; Forest Vegetation Simulator (FVS); loblolly pine; northern bobwhite; Odocoileus virginianus; Pinus taeda; white-tailed deer; SOUTHEASTERN UNITED-STATES; NORTHERN BOBWHITE; MANAGEMENT; DENSITY; MISSISSIPPI; FORESTS;
D O I
10.1002/jwmg.21330
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Little quantitative information is available to nonindustrial-private forest (NIPF) owners regarding economic tradeoffs between managing pine plantations for timber production or wildlife habitat. We modeled loblolly (Pinus taeda) pine plantations to quantify economic tradeoffs for competing management scenarios using densities aimed at wildlife habitat or timber production in the Lower Coastal Plain and Coastal Flatwoods regions of Mississippi, USA. Scenarios contained a range of site indices, planting densities, thinning densities and frequencies, and rotation lengths for timber maximization and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) or northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) habitat production. Land expectation values (LEVs) were highest for timber scenarios, followed by joint deer and timber, joint quail and timber, deer, and quail management scenarios. Comparison to the regional hunting lease rate revealed that compensatory lease rates from the study could be realized, making wildlife management as valuable as timber management. The results of this study could help landowners be more informed about economic tradeoffs when making management decisions on their property. (C) 2017 The Wildlife Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1363 / 1371
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条