The complexity of innovation: an assessment and review of the complexity perspective

被引:37
|
作者
Poutanen, Petro [1 ]
Soliman, Wael [2 ]
Stahle, Pirjo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Social Res, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Aalto Univ, Sch Business, Dept Informat & Serv Econ, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Aalto Univ, Sch Engn, Inst Measuring & Modelling, Espoo, Finland
关键词
Innovation; Open innovation; Complex adaptive systems; Innovation process; Complexity theory; Complexity perspective; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; SELF-ORGANIZATION; SYSTEMS; AMBIDEXTERITY; INSIGHTS; EXPLOITATION; EVOLUTIONARY; EXPLORATION; MANAGEMENT; CUSTOMERS;
D O I
10.1108/EJIM-03-2014-0036
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of the innovation literature, with special focus on studies applying a complexity perspective. As a contribution in its own right to the innovation literature, the review clarifies the concept of complexity, explores possible points of relevance and the "added value" gained from complexity theory (CT) to the study of innovation, and identifies some of the applications of the theory. Design/methodology/approach - A literature search was conducted which yielded 20 relevant articles. These articles were analyzed by focusing on the key concepts of complexity and studying their applications in the context of innovation research. Findings - Based on the approach adopted, the literature was divided into three categories, namely research focusing on microdynamics, macrodynamics, and leadership and management. The key complexity concepts identified in the innovation literature were "edge of chaos", "phase shift", "emergence and self-organization", "(co)evolution", and " complexity regulation". The articles reviewed differed in terms of their perspectives on complexity and, accordingly, their operationalization of the complexity concepts. Key areas of development suggested by the authors include forging a stronger link with existing innovation theory and giving greater weight to empirical evidence. Research limitations/implications - While a systematic review strategy was adopted to identify all relevant research on "open innovation" and complexity, a selective snowball strategy was deemed the only feasible approach to cover research conducted on "innovation" and complexity. Practical implications - Practitioners can learn to put CT-based research in context and also learn to recognize the value of CT for innovation management. The authors distilled three important lessons for practice from the research done: embracing complexity, embracing ambidexterity, and embracing failure. Originality/value - To the best of the authors' knowledge no review has as yet been undertaken to encapsulate the current state of applications of CT to innovation research.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:189 / 213
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Capacities for Institutional Innovation: A Complexity Perspective
    Woodhill, Jim
    IDS BULLETIN-INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2010, 41 (03): : 47 - 59
  • [2] STRUCTURAL VERSUS EXPERIENCED COMPLEXITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL COMPLEXITY AND INNOVATION
    Cara, Maya
    Birkinshaw, Julian
    Heywood, Suzanne
    ENTREPRENEURSHIP, INNOVATION, AND PLATFORMS, 2017, 37 : 115 - 150
  • [3] Success and failure? A complexity perspective on an organizational innovation blockage
    Puustinen, Alisa
    Lehtimaki, Hanna
    EMERGENCE-COMPLEXITY & ORGANIZATION, 2016, 18 (3-4):
  • [4] The compatibility of reductionistic and complexity approaches in a sociomedical innovation perspective
    Naaldenberg, Jenneken
    Aarts, Noelle
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 5 (12):
  • [5] Complexity and innovation
    Brown, JS
    INTERACTION OF COMPLEXITY AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, : 145 - 154
  • [6] Applying complexity theory perspective to knowledge management in the innovation context
    Pacheco, Carla
    Paul, Bino
    VINE JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2023,
  • [7] Managing Innovation Networks for Knowledge Mobility and Appropriability: A Complexity Perspective
    de Zubielqui, Graciela Corral
    Jones, Janice
    Statsenko, Larissa
    ENTREPRENEURSHIP RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2016, 6 (01) : 75 - 109
  • [8] Understanding gender differences in logistics innovation: A complexity theory perspective
    Gligor, David
    Russo, Ivan
    Maloni, Michael J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2022, 246
  • [9] Reducing Risks in Energy Innovation Projects: Complexity Theory Perspective
    Mihic, Marko M.
    Dodevska, Zorica A.
    Todorovic, Marija Lj.
    Obradovic, Vladimir Lj.
    Petrovic, Dejan C.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [10] Harnessing the Complexity of Innovation
    Jorg, Ton
    Hughes, Stephanie Akkaoui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE AND SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2013, 4 (03) : 1 - 13