Delineating the relationship between Point A prescription dose and pelvic lymph node doses in intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment of cervical cancer for use in low- and middle-income countries

被引:2
|
作者
Weaver, John [1 ]
Harmon, Grant [1 ]
Harkenrider, Matthew M. [1 ]
Surucu, Murat [1 ]
Wood, Abbie [1 ]
Alite, Fiori [1 ]
Small, William, Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ, Stritch Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Cervical cancer; Lymph nodes; Pelvic lymph nodes; Nodal boost; Point A; Prescription dose; CLINICAL TARGET VOLUME; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; STAGE-IB; POSTOPERATIVE TREATMENT; CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; BOOST IRRADIATION; CARCINOMA; RADIOTHERAPY; CISPLATIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.brachy.2017.09.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To define the relationship between the Point A prescription dose and the dose delivered to various pelvic lymph node groups during high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment of cervical cancer. In less developed countries, brachytherapy is often done without three-dimensional image guidance, instead relying on plain radiography and prescription to Point A. A defined relationship between Point A dose and lymph node doses would help physicians in these health care settings to more accurately estimate nodal doses. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment data from 50 fractions of HDR brachytherapy of cervical cancer were reviewed, the pelvic lymph nodes were contoured, and dose volume histogram parameters were obtained. Dose volume histogram parameters for each contour were normalized as a percentage of the corresponding Point A dose. All nodal groups were divided into left and right sides, except the presacral nodal group. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Mean Point A doses were bilateral (Bil) 5.92 Gy +/- 0.58, left (L) 5.93 +/- 0.59, and right (R) 5.92 +/- 0.59. Mean normalized D90 values for the various lymph node groups were as follows-obturator: Bil 20.3% +/- 4.5, L 20.5% +/- 4.4, and R 20.2% +/- 5.2; external iliac: Bil 9.5% +/- 2.9, L 10.0% +/- 3.1, and R 9.5% +/- 3.0; internal iliac: Bil 12.2% +/- 3.5, L 12.1% +/- 3.4, and R 12.9% +/- 4.7; common iliac: Bil 4.3% +/- 1.6, L 4.3% +/- 1.6, and R 4.3% +/- 1.7; and presacral: 8.7% +/- 3.4. These relationships can serve as a useful tool for evaluating lymph node doses during HDR brachytherapy of cervical cancer in facilities performing two-dimensional treatment planning and those with limited resources. (C) 2017 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 207
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Impact of High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Training via Telehealth in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
    Hatcher, Jeremy B.
    Oladeru, Oluwadamilola
    Chang, Betty
    Malhotra, Sameeksha
    Mcleod, Megan
    Shulman, Adam
    Dempsey, Claire
    Mula-Hussain, Layth
    Tassoto, Michael
    Sandwall, Peter
    Dieterich, Sonja
    Sulieman, Lina
    Roa, Dante
    Li, Benjamin
    [J]. JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 : 1803 - 1812
  • [2] Variation in High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Dose Contribution Among Pelvic Lymph Node Groups in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
    Lee, Y.
    Rash, D. L.
    Stern, R. L.
    Mathai, M.
    Deer, D.
    Wang, F.
    Mayadev, J. S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S478 - S478
  • [3] The adverse effect of treatment prolongation in cervical cancer by high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy
    Chen, SW
    Liang, JA
    Yang, SN
    Ko, HL
    Lin, FJ
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 67 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [4] CORRELATION OF POINT B AND LYMPH NODE DOSE IN 3D-PLANNED HIGH-DOSE-RATE CERVICAL CANCER BRACHYTHERAPY
    Lee, Larissa J.
    Sadow, Cheryl A.
    Russell, Anthony
    Viswanathan, Akila N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : 803 - 809
  • [5] The American Brachytherapy Society and Indian Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for the establishment of high-dose-rate brachytherapy programs for gynecological malignancies in low- and middle-income countries
    Grover, Surbhi
    Lichter, Katie E.
    Likhacheva, Anna
    Jang, Joanne W.
    Ning, Matthew S.
    Robin, Tyler P.
    Small, William, Jr.
    Kudchadker, Rajat J.
    Swamidas, Jamema
    Chopra, Supriya
    Rai, Bhavana
    Sharma, Sunil Dutt
    Sharma, Daya N.
    Kuppusamy, Thayalan
    Yang, Ruijie
    Berger, Daniel
    Mendez, Lisbeth Cordero
    Glaser, Scott
    Erickson, Delnora L.
    Chino, Junzo
    Mourtada, Firas
    Abdel-Wahab, May
    Jhingran, Anuja
    Simonds, Hannah
    Mahantshetty, Umesh
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2023, 22 (06) : 716 - 727
  • [6] Assessment of the anatomical position of point B and the relationship between point B dose and the dose delivered to pelvic lymph nodes in CT-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer
    Matsukawa, Hideaki
    Sasaki, Tomonari
    Hirayama, Ryota
    Hirose, Taka-aki
    Fukunaga, Jun-ichi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 11 (02) : 137 - 145
  • [7] A study of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy boost for curative treatment of uterine cervical cancer
    Okuma, Kae
    Yamashita, Hideomi
    Kobayashi, Reiko
    Nakagawa, Keiichi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2015, 7 (02) : 128 - 134
  • [8] Dosimetric and radiobiological evaluation of treatment plan for cervical cancer high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy
    Kaur, Gurpreet
    Garg, Pardeep
    Srivastava, Anoop Kumar
    Gaur, Garima
    Sheetal
    Grover, Romikant
    Kang, Manraj Singh
    Dangwal, Vinod Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2022, 14 (03) : 253 - 259
  • [9] Low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate brachytherapy in treatment of prostate cancer - between options
    Skowronek, Janusz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2013, 5 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [10] The equivalent dose contribution from high-dose-rate brachytherapy to positive pelvic lymph nodes in locally advanced cervical cancer
    Lee, Yongsook C.
    Rash, Dominique L.
    Stern, Robin L.
    Mayadev, Jyoti S.
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2013, 12 (06) : 555 - 559