Effect of the Transition Points Mismatch on Quanta Image Sensors

被引:4
|
作者
Xu, Jiangtao [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Xiyang [1 ,2 ]
Han, Liqiang [2 ,3 ]
Nie, Kaiming [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Jianguo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Microelect, 92 Weijin Rd, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Key Lab Imaging & Sensing Microelect Tech, 92 Weijin Rd, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, 92 Weijin Rd, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ADC; bit error rate; imaging model; quanta image sensor; transition point; SINGLE-BIT;
D O I
10.3390/s18124357
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Mathematical models and imaging models that show the relationship between the transition points mismatch of analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) and the bit error rate (BER) in single-bit and multi-bit quanta image sensors (QISs) are established. The mathematical models suggest that when the root-mean-square (r.m.s.) of the read noise in jots is 0.15e, the standard deviation of the transition points should be less than 0.15e to ensure that the BER is lower than 1% in the single-bit QIS, and 0.21e to ensure that the BER is lower than 5% in the multi-bit QIS. Based on the mathematical models, the imaging models prove that the fixed-pattern noise (FPN) increases with a stronger transition point mismatch. The imaging models also compare the imaging quality in the case of different spatial oversampling factors and bit depths. The grayscale similarity index (GSI) is 3.31 LSB and 1.74 LSB when the spatial oversampling factors are 256 and 4096, respectively, in the single-bit QIS. The GSI is 1.93 LSB and 1.13 LSB when the bit depth is 3 and 4, respectively, in the multi-bit QIS. It indicates that a higher bit depth and a larger spatial oversampling factor could reduce the effect of the transition points mismatch of1-bit or n-bit ADCs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CMOS Image Sensors and the Quanta Image Sensor
    Fossum, Eric R.
    [J]. 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPTICAL MEMS AND NANOPHOTONICS (OMN), 2018, : 181 - 182
  • [2] IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION AND THRESHOLD DESIGN FOR QUANTA IMAGE SENSORS
    Elgendy, Omar A.
    Chan, Stanley H.
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2016, : 978 - 982
  • [3] Color Filter Arrays for Quanta Image Sensors
    Elgendy, Omar A.
    Chan, Stanley H.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL IMAGING, 2020, 6 : 652 - 665
  • [4] IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION FOR QUANTA IMAGE SENSORS USING DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS
    Choi, Joon Hee
    Elgendy, Omar A.
    Chan, Stanley H.
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2018, : 6543 - 6547
  • [5] Theoretical analysis and image reconstruction for multi-bit quanta image sensors *
    Wong, Hiu-Tung
    Leung, Chi-Sing
    Ho, Derek
    [J]. SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2021, 185
  • [6] Low-power readout circuit for quanta image sensors
    Masoodian, S.
    Odame, K.
    Fossum, E. R.
    [J]. ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 2014, 50 (08) : 589 - 590
  • [7] A 2.5 pJ/b Binary Image Sensor as a Pathfinder for Quanta Image Sensors
    Masoodian, Saleh
    Rao, Arun
    Ma, Jiaju
    Odame, Kofi
    Fossum, Eric R.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 2016, 63 (01) : 100 - 105
  • [8] Review of Quanta Image Sensors for Ultralow-Light Imaging
    Ma, Jiaju
    Chan, Stanley
    Fossum, Eric R.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 2022, 69 (06) : 2824 - 2839
  • [9] Images from Bits: Non-Iterative Image Reconstruction for Quanta Image Sensors
    Chan, Stanley H.
    Elgendy, Omar A.
    Wang, Xiran
    [J]. SENSORS, 2016, 16 (11)
  • [10] 1/f Noise Modelling and Characterization for CMOS Quanta Image Sensors
    Deng, Wei
    Fossum, Eric R.
    [J]. SENSORS, 2019, 19 (24)