Point-Based Mark-Recapture Distance Sampling

被引：29
|
作者：
Laake, J. L. [2 ]
Collier, B. A. [1 ]
Morrison, M. L. [3 ]
Wilkins, R. N. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Inst Renewable Nat Resources, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] NMFS, Natl Marine Mammal Lab, Alaska Fisheries Sci Ctr, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Wildlife & Fisheries Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
来源：
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS | 2011年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词：
Avian surveys; Detection bias; Distance sampling; Double-observer methods; Golden-cheeked warbler; Mark-recapture; Point independence; Unmodeled heterogeneity; ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITIES; LINE TRANSECT; VISIBILITY BIAS; AERIAL SURVEY; ABUNDANCE; HETEROGENEITY; COMBINATION; REMOVAL; MODELS;
D O I：
10.1007/s13253-011-0059-5
中图分类号：
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号：
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要：
Avian surveys using point sampling for abundance estimation have either focused on distance sampling or more commonly mark-recapture to correct for detection bias. Combining mark-recapture and distance sampling (MRDS) has become an effective tool for line transects, but it has been largely ignored in point sampling literature. We describe MRDS and show that the previously published methods for point sampling are special cases. Using simulated data and golden-cheeked warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia) survey data from Texas, we demonstrate large differences in abundance estimates resulting from different independence assumptions. Data and code are provided in supplementary materials.
引用
收藏
页码：389 / 408
页数：20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Point-Based Mark-Recapture Distance Sampling
    J. L. Laake
    B. A. Collier
    M. L. Morrison
    R. N. Wilkins
    [J]. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2011, 16 : 389 - 408
  • [2] Hierarchical Mark-Recapture Distance Sampling to Estimate Moose Abundance
    Oyster, Jared H.
    Keren, Ilai N.
    Hansen, Sara J. K.
    Harris, Richard B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 82 (08): : 1668 - 1679
  • [3] Mark-Recapture Distance Sampling for Aerial Surveys of Ungulates on Rangelands
    Peterson, Mary K.
    Foley, Aaron M.
    Tri, Andrew N.
    Hewitt, David G.
    DeYoung, Randy W.
    DeYoung, Charles A.
    Campbell, Tyler A.
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2020, 44 (04): : 713 - 723
  • [4] Using mark-recapture distance sampling methods on line transect surveys
    Burt, Mary Louise
    Borchers, David L.
    Jenkins, Kurt J.
    Marques, Tiago A.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2014, 5 (11): : 1180 - 1191
  • [5] Accounting for uncertainty in duplicate identification and group size judgements in mark-recapture distance sampling
    Hamilton, Olivia N. P.
    Kincaid, Sophie E.
    Constantine, Rochelle
    Kozmian-Ledward, Lily
    Walker, Cameron G.
    Fewster, Rachel M.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 9 (02): : 354 - 362
  • [6] INTEGRATED AREA SAMPLING AND MARK-RECAPTURE EXPERIMENTS FOR SAMPLING FISH POPULATIONS
    JENSEN, AL
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1992, 48 (04) : 1201 - 1205
  • [7] Mark-recapture of microorganisms
    McMullen, John George, II
    Lennon, Jay T.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 25 (01) : 150 - 157
  • [8] A comparison of mark-recapture distance-sampling methods applied to aerial surveys of eastern grey kangaroos
    Fewster, Rachel M.
    Pople, Anthony R.
    [J]. WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (04) : 320 - 330
  • [9] Classroom mark-recapture with crickets
    Whiteley, Andrew R.
    Woolf, Jennifer
    Kennedy, Kathleen
    Oberbillig, David
    Brewer, Carol
    [J]. AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER, 2007, 69 (05): : 292 - 297
  • [10] Persistence models for mark-recapture
    Ramsey, Fred L.
    Severns, Paul M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2010, 17 (01) : 97 - 109
12345