Delay- and Disruption-Tolerant Networking (DTN): An Alternative Solution for Future Satellite Networking Applications

被引:168
|
作者
Caini, Carlo [1 ]
Cruickshank, Haitham [2 ]
Farrell, Stephen [3 ]
Marchese, Mario [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Elect Comp Sci & Syst DEIS, I-40125 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Surrey, Ctr Commun Syst Res, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[3] Trinity Coll Dublin, Dept Comp Sci, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Univ Genoa, Dept Commun Comp & Syst Sci, I-16145 Genoa, Italy
关键词
Delay- and disruption-tolerant networking (DTN); performance enhancing proxies (PEPs); quality of service (QoS); satellite communications; security; SERVICE ATTACKS; PERFORMANCE; SECURITY;
D O I
10.1109/JPROC.2011.2158378
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Satellite communications are characterized by long delays, packet losses, and sometimes intermittent connectivity and link disruptions. The TCP/IP stack is ineffective against these impairments and even dedicated solutions, such as performance enhancing proxies (PEPs), can hardly tackle the most challenging environments, and create compatibility issues with current security protocols. An alternative solution arises from the delay- and disruption-tolerant networking (DTN) architecture, which specifies an overlay protocol, called bundle protocol (BP), on top of either transport protocols (TCP, UDP, etc.), or of lower layer protocols (Bluetooth, Ethernet, etc.). The DTN architecture provides long-term information storage on intermediate nodes, suitable for coping with disrupted links, long delays, and intermittent connectivity. By dividing the end-to-end path into multiple DTN hops, in a way that actually extends the TCP-splitting concept exploited in most PEPs, DTN allows the use of specialized protocols on the satellite (or space) links. This paper discusses the prospects for use of DTN in future satellite networks. We present a broad DTN overview, to make the reader familiar with the characteristics that differentiate DTN from ordinary TCP/IP networking, compare the DTN and PEP architectures and stacks, as a preliminary step for the subsequent DTN performance assessment carried out in practical LEO/GEO satellite scenarios. DTN security is studied next, examining the advantages over present satellite architectures, the threats faced in satellite scenarios, and also open issues. Finally, the relation between DTN and quality of service (QoS) is investigated, by focusing on QoS architectures and QoS tools and by discussing the state of the art of DTN research activity in modeling, routing, and congestion control.
引用
收藏
页码:1980 / 1997
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Delay- and Disruption-Tolerant Networking
    McMahon, Alex
    Farrell, Stephen
    IEEE INTERNET COMPUTING, 2009, 13 (06) : 82 - 87
  • [2] When TCP breaks - Delay- and disruption-tolerant networking
    Farrell, Stephen
    Cahill, Vinny
    Geraghty, Dermot
    Humphreys, Ivor
    McDonald, Paul
    IEEE INTERNET COMPUTING, 2006, 10 (04) : 72 - 78
  • [3] DTN (Delay- Disruption- Disconnect- Tolerant Networking)
    Miwa H.
    Kyokai Joho Imeji Zasshi/Journal of the Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers, 2010, 64 (06): : 807 - 809
  • [4] Delay/Disruption-Tolerant Network (DTN) Network Management for Space Networking
    Meng, Ke
    Zeng, Hui
    Deng, Hongmei
    Li, Hongjun
    2015 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2015,
  • [5] Opportunities and limits of moderate source routing in delay-/disruption-tolerant networking space networks
    Birrane, Edward J.
    Caini, Carlo
    De Cola, Gian Marco
    Marchetti, Federico
    Mazzuca, Laura
    Persampieri, Lorenzo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING, 2022, 40 (06) : 428 - 444
  • [6] Proactive Retransmission in Delay-/Disruption-Tolerant Networking for Reliable Deep-Space Vehicle Communications
    Wang, Ruhai
    Sabbagh, Alaa
    Burleigh, Scott C.
    Zhao, Kanglian
    Qian, Yi
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 67 (10) : 9983 - 9994
  • [7] DTN-RPC: Remote Procedure Calls for Disruption-Tolerant Networking
    Sterz, Artur
    Baumgaertner, Lars
    Mogk, Ragnar
    Mezini, Mira
    Freisleben, Bernd
    2017 IFIP NETWORKING CONFERENCE (IFIP NETWORKING) AND WORKSHOPS, 2017,
  • [8] ProgDTN: Programmable Disruption-Tolerant Networking
    Sommer, Markus
    Hoechst, Jonas
    Sterz, Artur
    Penning, Alvar
    Freisleben, Bernd
    NETWORKED SYSTEMS, NETYS 2022, 2022, 13464 : 184 - 200
  • [9] The SPINDLE Disruption-Tolerant Networking system
    Krishnan, Rajesh
    Basu, Prithwish
    Mikkelson, Joanne M.
    Small, Christopher
    Ramanathan, Ram
    Brown, Daniel W.
    Burgess, John R.
    Caro, Armando L.
    Condell, Matthew
    Goffee, Nicholas C.
    Hain, Regina Rosales
    Hansen, Richard E.
    Jones, Christine E.
    Kawadia, Vikas
    Mankins, David P.
    Schwartz, Beverly I.
    Strayer, William T.
    Ward, Jeffrey W.
    Wiggins, David R.
    Polit, Stephen H.
    2007 IEEE MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-8, 2007, : 3085 - 3091
  • [10] On the Effectiveness of Position-based Routing in Delay/Disruption-Tolerant Networking
    Kawabata, Natusko
    Yamasaki, Yasuhiro
    Ohsaki, Hiroyuki
    2019 IEEE 43RD ANNUAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (COMPSAC), VOL 2, 2019, : 19 - 23