Chemotherapy in elderly small-cell lung cancer patients: yes we can, but should we do it?

被引:17
|
作者
Janssen-Heijnen, M. L. G. [1 ,2 ]
Maas, H. A. A. M. [3 ]
van de Schans, S. A. M. [1 ]
Coebergh, J. W. W. [1 ,2 ]
Groen, H. J. M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Canc Registry, Comprehens Canc Ctr S, Dept Res, NL-5600 AE Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Tweesteden Hosp, Dept Geriatr Med, Tilburg, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pulm Dis, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
elderly; population-based; small-cell lung cancer; toxicity; treatment tolerance; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; AGE; ETOPOSIDE; COMORBIDITY; CARCINOMA; RADIOTHERAPY; CARBOPLATIN; MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSIS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdq448
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Twenty percent of all newly diagnosed patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are > 75 years. Elderly patients may show more toxicity due to co-morbidity. We evaluated motives for adherence to treatment guidelines, completion of treatment and toxicity. Patients and methods: Population-based data from patients aged >= 75 years and diagnosed with SCLC in 1997-2004 in The Netherlands were used (368 limited disease and 577 extensive disease). Additional data on co-morbidity (Adult Co-morbidity Evaluation 27), World Health Organisation performance status (PS), treatment, motive for no chemotherapy, adaptations and underlying motive and grade 3 or 4 toxicity were gathered from the medical records. Results: Forty-eight percent did not receive chemotherapy. The most common motives were refusal by the patient or family, short life expectancy or a combination of high age, co-morbidity and poor PS. Although only relatively fit elderly were selected for chemotherapy, 60%-75% developed serious toxicity, and two-thirds of all patients could not complete the full chemotherapy. Conclusions: We hypothesise that a better selection by proper geriatric assessments is needed to achieve a more favourable balance between benefit and harm.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 826
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Yes, We Can! (Should We?)
    Aversano, Thomas
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2015, 132 (05) : 365 - 367
  • [2] Small-cell lung cancer: where are we now and what can we expect for the future?
    Karachaliou, Niki
    Rosell, Rafael
    [J]. FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2013, 9 (08) : 1065 - 1068
  • [3] Yes we can, but do we?
    Jacobs, Howy
    [J]. EMBO REPORTS, 2013, 14 (09) : 749 - 749
  • [4] How Should We Handle Elderly Patients of the Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?
    Okamoto, Junichi
    Kubokura, Hirotoshi
    Usuda, Jitsuo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10 (09) : S669 - S670
  • [5] SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER IN ELDERLY PATIENTS - THE CASE FOR CHEMOTHERAPY
    KELLY, P
    OBRIEN, AAJ
    DALY, P
    CLANCY, L
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 1991, 20 (01) : 19 - 22
  • [6] How safe is chemotherapy and chemoradiation in elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer?
    Janssen-Heijnen, Maryska L. G.
    [J]. LUNG CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2014, 3 (01) : 5 - 7
  • [7] Thoracoscopic maze: yes, we can, but should we?
    Mont, Lluis
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2019, 21 (06): : 838 - 839
  • [8] Management of stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients: should we do differently?-a narrative review
    Minervini, Fabrizio
    Bertoglio, Pietro
    Kestenholz, Peter
    Kocher, Gregor J.
    Atasayar, Nail
    Scarci, Marco
    [J]. CURRENT CHALLENGES IN THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 4
  • [9] Extended pneumonectomy for non small cell lung cancer - should we still do it?
    Dyszkiewicz, W
    Piwkowski, C
    Kasprzyk, M
    Ramlau, R
    Adamczak, J
    Pawlak, K
    [J]. NEOPLASMA, 2004, 51 (02) : 150 - 154
  • [10] Immunotherapy in small-cell lung cancer: at what point are we?
    Rossi, Antonio
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 4