Organ failure and tight glycemic control in the SPRINT study

被引:87
|
作者
Chase, J. Geoffrey [1 ]
Pretty, Christopher G. [1 ]
Pfeifer, Leesa [2 ]
Shaw, Geoffrey M. [3 ]
Preiser, Jean-Charles [4 ]
Le Compte, Aaron J. [1 ]
Lin, Jessica [2 ]
Hewett, Darren [1 ]
Moorhead, Katherine T.
Desaive, Thomas [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Mech Engn, Ctr Bioengn, Christchurch 8054, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago Christchurch, Sch Med, Christchurch 8054, New Zealand
[3] Christchurch Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Christchurch 8054, New Zealand
[4] Ctr Hosp Univ Liege, Dept Intens Care, B-4000 Cointe Ougree, Belgium
[5] Univ Liege, Inst Phys, Cardiovasc Res Ctr, B-4000 Cointe Ougree, Belgium
来源
CRITICAL CARE | 2010年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; INSULIN INFUSION PROTOCOL; MODEL-BASED INSULIN; CRITICAL ILLNESS; SOFA SCORE; GLUCOSE CONTROL; SYSTEM FAILURE; CALORIC-INTAKE; ICU PATIENTS;
D O I
10.1186/cc9224
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Intensive care unit mortality is strongly associated with organ failure rate and severity. The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score is used to evaluate the impact of a successful tight glycemic control (TGC) intervention (SPRINT) on organ failure, morbidity, and thus mortality. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 371 patients (3,356 days) on SPRINT (August 2005 - April 2007) and 413 retrospective patients (3,211 days) from two years prior, matched by Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III. SOFA is calculated daily for each patient. The effect of the SPRINT TGC intervention is assessed by comparing the percentage of patients with SOFA <= 5 each day and its trends over time and cohort/group. Organ-failure free days (all SOFA components <= 2) and number of organ failures (SOFA components >2) are also compared. Cumulative time in 4.0 to 7.0 mmol/L band (cTIB) was evaluated daily to link tightness and consistency of TGC (cTIB >= 0.5) to SOFA <= 5 using conditional and joint probabilities. Results: Admission and maximum SOFA scores were similar (P = 0.20; P = 0.76), with similar time to maximum (median: one day; IQR: [1,3] days; P = 0.99). Median length of stay was similar (4.1 days SPRINT and 3.8 days Pre-SPRINT; P = 0.94). The percentage of patients with SOFA = 5 is different over the first 14 days (P = 0.016), rising to approximately 75% for Pre-SPRINT and approximately 85% for SPRINT, with clear separation after two days. Organ-failure-free days were different (SPRINT = 41.6%; Pre-SPRINT = 36.5%; P < 0.0001) as were the percent of total possible organ failures (SPRINT = 16.0%; Pre-SPRINT = 19.0%; P < 0.0001). By Day 3 over 90% of SPRINT patients had cTIB >= 0.5 (37% Pre-SPRINT) reaching 100% by Day 7 (50% Pre-SPRINT). Conditional and joint probabilities indicate tighter, more consistent TGC under SPRINT (cTIB >= 0.5) increased the likelihood SOFA <= 5. Conclusions: SPRINT TGC resolved organ failure faster, and for more patients, from similar admission and maximum SOFA scores, than conventional control. These reductions mirror the reduced mortality with SPRINT. The cTIB >= 0.5 metric provides a first benchmark linking TGC quality to organ failure. These results support other physiological and clinical results indicating the role tight, consistent TGC can play in reducing organ failure, morbidity and mortality, and should be validated on data from randomised trials.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Organ failure and tight glycemic control in the SPRINT study
    J Geoffrey Chase
    Christopher G Pretty
    Leesa Pfeifer
    Geoffrey M Shaw
    Jean-Charles Preiser
    Aaron J Le Compte
    Jessica Lin
    Darren Hewett
    Katherine T Moorhead
    Thomas Desaive
    [J]. Critical Care, 14
  • [2] A pilot study of the SPRINT protocol for tight glycemic control in critically ill patients
    Lonergan, Timothy
    Le Compte, Aaron
    Willacy, Mike
    Chase, J. Geoffrey
    Shaw, Geoffrey M.
    Hann, Christopher E.
    Lotz, Thomas
    Lin, Jessica
    Wong, Xing-Wei
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 8 (04) : 449 - 462
  • [3] REDUCED ORGAN FAILURE WITH EFFECTIVE GLYCEMIC CONTROL
    Preiser, J. -C.
    Chase, J. G.
    Pretty, C. G.
    Pfeifer, L.
    Shaw, G. M.
    Le Compte, A. J.
    Lin, J.
    Hewett, D.
    Desaive, T.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 36 : S173 - S173
  • [4] TIGHT GLYCEMIC CONTROL: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON THE REASON FOR SUCCESS OR FAILURE
    Marik, P.
    Wiesen, P.
    Preiser, J. -C.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 35 : 121 - 121
  • [5] The importance of tight glycemic control
    Gerich, JE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 118 : 7S - 11S
  • [6] Incidence of Hypoglycemia with Tight Glycemic Control Protocols: A Comparative Study
    Anabtawi, A.
    Hurst, M.
    Titi, M.
    Patel, S.
    Palacio, C.
    Rajamani, K.
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 12 (08) : 635 - 639
  • [7] Social implications of tight glycemic control
    Chen, Kuan-chin Jean
    [J]. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2012, 58 (11) : 1300 - 1301
  • [8] Pro: Tight Perioperative glycemic control
    Schricker, T
    Carvalho, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2005, 19 (05) : 684 - 688
  • [9] Explaining benefits of tight glycemic control
    Winslow, EH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1998, 98 (04) : 66 - +
  • [10] Tight glycemic control in trauma patients
    Fujita, Tetsuji
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (05) : 904 - 905