Can environmental centralization help reduce pollution? Evidence from an administrative reform in China

被引:14
|
作者
Li, Weibing [1 ]
Yang, Yongwen [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ, 1037 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental centralization; Environmental decentralization; Ministry of environmental protection; China; QUASI-NATURAL EXPERIMENT; AIR-POLLUTION; DECENTRALIZATION; ENFORCEMENT; HYPOTHESIS; QUALITY; TRANSFORMATION; CONSEQUENCES; SPILLOVERS; GOVERNMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127972
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Amid the longstanding dispute over the centralization and decentralization of environmental regimes, most discussions have focused on developed countries. Few studies have tested the mechanisms underlying centralization and decentralization. The establishment of the Ministry of Environmental Protection in China in 2008 has led to various changes in the degree of environmental centralization. Based on this reform, we use standard and continuous difference-in-difference designs to estimate the effect of environmental centralization on pollution in developing countries and to test the underlying mechanisms. We find that the establishment of the Ministry of Environmental Protection has effectively led to reduced pollution in provinces with higher degrees of environmental decentralization. Furthermore, centralization has restricted local governments' free riding and reduced emissions at the borders. It has also strengthened local governments' incentives for environmental governance. The implication is that environmental centralization is conducive to reducing the free-riding behavior and raceto-the-bottom problems of developing economies, thus contributing to environmental well-being.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Centralization and border water pollution: Evidence from China's environmental enforcement reform
    Tang, Yu
    Mao, Yijie
    [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 481
  • [2] Centralization of environmental administration and air pollution: Evidence from China
    Chen, Jidong
    Shi, Xinzheng
    Zhang, Ming-ang
    Zhang, Sihan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 126
  • [3] Can environmental information disclosure reduce air pollution? Evidence from China
    Xiong, Lei
    Long, Hongyu
    Zhang, Xiang
    Yu, Chenyang
    Wen, Zezhou
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [4] Can Environmental Centralization Enhance Emission Reductions?-Evidence from China's Vertical Management Reform
    Cheng, Linlin
    Song, Qiangxi
    He, Ke
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (15)
  • [5] Fiscal centralization and urban industrial pollution emissions reduction: Evidence from the vertical reform of environmental administrations in China
    Cheng, Yangyang
    Xu, Zhenhuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 347
  • [6] Can high-speed rail reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from China
    Yang, Xuehui
    Lin, Shanlang
    Li, Yan
    He, Minghua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 239
  • [7] The environmental and economic consequences of environmental centralization: Evidence from China's environmental vertical management reform
    Tan, Jing
    Liu, Tianyi
    Xu, Hao
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 84
  • [8] The effect of environmental centralisation on productivity: Evidence from an administrative reform in China
    Li, Weibing
    Yang, Yongwen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 36 (02) : 824 - 851
  • [9] Can power market reform reduce air pollution?--Evidence from prefecture-level cities in China
    Li, Xing
    Liu, Zimin
    Yang, Dan
    Wei, Yong
    Gong, Na
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (04):
  • [10] Reform of government level and local environmental pollution: evidence from China
    Yu, Jingyuan
    Chen, Shuai
    Li, Linmu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023,