Effects of CS-US contingency and trial order on differential conditioning and shock expectancy to masked stimuli

被引：0

作者：

Wiens, S

Berger, JN

Katkin, ES

Öhman, A

机构：

[1] Karolinska Inst, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden

[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA

来源：

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY | 2001年 / 38卷

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：S100 / S100

页数：1

共 35 条

[1] Effects of trial order and differential conditioning on acquisition of differential shock expectancy and skin conductance conditioning to masked stimuli
Wiens, S
Katkin, ES
Ohman, A
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 40 (06) : 989 - 997
[2] A role for CS-US contingency in Pavlovian conditioning
Murphy, RA
Baker, AG
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 2004, 30 (03): : 229 - 239
[3] THE ROLE OF CS-US CONTINGENCY IN HUMAN EVALUATIVE CONDITIONING
BAEYENS, F
HERMANS, D
EELEN, P
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1993, 31 (08) : 731 - 737
[4] Reconsidering the (in)sensitivity of evaluative conditioning to reinforcement density and CS-US contingency
Kattner, Florian
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 2014, 45 : 15 - 29
[5] DIFFERENTIAL CLASSICAL SALIVARY CONDITIONING IN DOG - EFFECTS OF 3 CS-US INTERVALS
OST, JWP
PROCTOR, S
DEFONSO, L
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1968, 22 (3P2) : 1169 - &
[6] STRAIN DIFFERENCES IN AVOIDANCE-CONDITIONING AS A FUNCTION OF CLASSICAL CS-US CONTINGENCY
KATZEV, RD
MILLS, SK
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 87 (04): : 661 - 671
[7] EFFECTS OF CS-US INTERVAL ON AVOIDANCE CONDITIONING OF CATS
SCHRIER, AM
JOURNAL OF GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1961, 98 (JUN): : 203 - &
[8] EFFECTS OF SCOPOLAMINE INJECTION DURING CS-US INTERVAL ON CONDITIONING
KRAL, PA
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1971, 28 (03) : 690 - &
[9] EFFECTS OF CS-US INTERVAL ON CONDITIONING OF DRUG RESPONSE WITH ASSESSMENT OF SPEED OF CONDITIONING
PICKENS, RW
CROWDER, WF
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIA, 1967, 11 (01): : 88 - 88
[10] CONTRASTIVE CS-US RELATIONS REVERSE EVALUATIVE CONDITIONING EFFECTS
Unkelbach, Christian
Fiedler, Klaus
SOCIAL COGNITION, 2016, 34 (05) : 413 - 434

← 1 2 3 4 →