Impact of biological sex on the outcomes of spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain

被引:8
|
作者
Mekhail, Nagy [1 ]
Costandi, Shrif [1 ]
Saweris, Youssef [1 ]
Armanyous, Sherif [1 ]
Chauhan, Gaurav [2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Evidence Based Pain Management Res, C25,9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr UPMC, Pain Med Program, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
efficacy of spinal cord stimulator; neuromodulation; outcomes of SCS; spinal cord stimulation; SCS and biological sex; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; CHRONIC BACK; GONADAL-HORMONES; SURGERY; PREDICTORS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1111/papr.13097
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) continues to gain increasing popularity in the pain management field for the treatment of different painful conditions; however, to-date, the correlation between the SCS effectiveness and biological sex has not been fully established. We aimed to investigate the correlation between the biological sex and SCS outcomes. Methods Following Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective cohort study was performed by collecting data for patients treated with SCS at a tertiary academic center between the years 2002 and 2019. Data was assessed with multivariable linear regression to investigate the association between biological sex and pain scores at baseline, 6-, and 12- months following SCS implantation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed based on a set of covariates including age, duration of pain, time since implant, BMI, opioid medications use, smoking, depression and history of alcohol, or substance abuse. Results Of the patients treated with SCS implants, 418 patients fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria, out of which the majority were females (272, 65%). The pre-matching data reported a significant difference in history of diabetes and depression and was also significant for greater opioid use in male patients at baseline, 6-, and 12-months post-SCS implant. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed based on the above mentioned covariant. After matching, no statistical difference was found among the variables, in both groups. Furthermore, after matching no significant differences in the pain scores at baseline, 6-, and 12-months post-SCS implant were observed. Conclusion No biological sex-based differences in the analgesic response to SCS therapy was detected at 6- and 12-months post-SCS implant between groups with similar demographics, biomedical, and psychological values.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 439
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SPINAL-CORD STIMULATION OUTCOMES FOR CHRONIC PAIN PATIENTS
    ROGERS, JH
    MCFADDEN, IJ
    SAGE, J
    WIELDE, K
    LAMOUREUX, B
    REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 40 (02) : 156 - 156
  • [2] Pain and Interoceptive Awareness Outcomes of Chronic Pain Patients With Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Park, Yunseo Linda
    Hunter, Jared
    Sheldon, Breanna L.
    Sabourin, Shelby
    DiMarzio, Marisa
    Khazen, Olga
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 24 (08): : 1357 - 1362
  • [3] Physiological Impact of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Gastroparesis Patients With Chronic Abdominal Pain
    Rejeski, Jared
    Kapural, Leonardo
    Koch, Kenneth
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 117 (10): : S1164 - S1165
  • [4] Duloxetine Improves Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes for Chronic Pain
    Prabhala, Tarun
    Sabourin, Shelby
    DiMarzio, Marisa
    Gillogly, Michael
    Prusik, Julia
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2019, 22 (02): : 215 - 218
  • [5] Factors Contributing to Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes for Chronic Pain
    Graham, Dakota T.
    Lambert, Margaret
    Mirzadeh, Zaman
    Ponce, Francisco A.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2022, 25 (01): : 145 - 154
  • [6] Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain
    Vallejo, Ricardo
    Bradley, Kerry
    Kapural, Leonardo
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (14) : S53 - S60
  • [7] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain
    Ilina, Olga
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 16 : 170 - 170
  • [8] Chronic pain and spinal cord stimulation
    Corallo, Francesco
    De Salvo, Simona
    Cannistraci, Cecilia
    Lo Buono, Viviana
    Di Cara, Marcella
    Floridia, Daniela
    Cerra, Francesco
    Romeo, Laura
    Pria, Deborah
    Bramanti, Placido
    Marino, Silvia
    Bonanno, Lilla
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (22) : E20490
  • [9] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain
    Jeon, Younghoon
    Huh, Billy K.
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2009, 38 (11) : 998 - 1003
  • [10] Cervical and cervicomedullary spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain: Efficacy and outcomes
    Chivukula, Srinivas
    Tempel, Zachary J.
    Weiner, Gregory M.
    Gande, Abhiram V.
    Chen, Ching-Jen
    Ding, Dale
    Moossy, John J.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 127 : 33 - 41