Effect of water matrices on removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes

被引:71
|
作者
Dolar, Davor [1 ]
Vukovic, Ana [1 ]
Asperger, Danijela [2 ]
Kosutic, Kresimir [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Chem Engn & Technol, Dept Phys Chem, HR-10002 Zagreb, Croatia
[2] Univ Zagreb, Fac Chem Engn & Technol, Dept Analyt Chem, HR-10002 Zagreb, Croatia
关键词
WASTE-WATER; RETENTION; ANTIBIOTICS; REJECTION;
D O I
10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60545-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study explored the removal of five veterinary pharmaceuticals (VPs) (sulfamethoxazole (SMETOX), trimethoprim (TMP), ciprofloxacin (CIPRO), dexamethasone (DEXA) and febantel (FEBA)) from different water matrices (Milli-Q water, model water, tap water and real pharmaceutical wastewater using four types of nanofiltration (NF) membranes (NF90, NF270, NF and HL) and two reverse osmosis (RO) membranes (LFC-1 and XLE). All VPs were added to different water matrices at a concentration of 10 mg/L. Rejections of VPs and water flux were measured. The rejection increased with increase of molecular weight. The highest rejections were obtained with RO membranes (LFC-1, XLE) and tight NF (NF90) membrane. In general, the rejection of VPs was higher in model water and tap water than in Milli-Q water, but the water flux was lower. This was mainly explained by ion adsorption inside the membranes pores. Narrower pore size counteracted the effect of presence of low concentration of natural organic matter (NOM) in tap water. The NOM was assumed to enhance the adsorption of VPs onto membrane surface, increased the size exclusion and electrostatic repulsion also appeared during the transport. Investigated water matrices had influence on water flux decline due to their complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1307
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of water matrices on removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes
    Davor Dolar
    Ana Vukovi
    Danijela Aperger
    Kreimir Kouti
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2011, 23 (08) : 1299 - 1307
  • [2] Effect of water matrices on removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes
    Davor Dolar
    Ana Vukovi
    Danijela Aperger
    Kreimir Kouti
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2011, (08) : 1299 - 1307
  • [3] Effect of silica fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes
    Lin, Yi-Li
    Chiou, Jheng-Hong
    Lee, Chung-Hsiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2014, 277 : 102 - 109
  • [4] Assessing potential of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for removal of toxic pharmaceuticals from water
    Licona, K. P. M.
    Geaquinto, L. R. de O.
    Nicolini, J. V.
    Figueiredo, N. G.
    Chiapetta, S. C.
    Habert, A. C.
    Yokoyama, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2018, 25 : 195 - 204
  • [5] Removal of antibiotics and estrogens by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes
    Yang, Linyan
    Xia, Caiping
    Jiang, Jielun
    Chen, Xueming
    Zhou, Yanbo
    Yuan, Cheng
    Bai, Lichun
    Meng, Shujuan
    Cao, Guomin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2024, 461
  • [6] Performance of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for arsenic removal from drinking water
    Elcik, Harun
    Celik, Suna O.
    Cakmakci, Mehmet
    Ozkaya, Bestamin
    [J]. DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2016, 57 (43) : 20422 - 20429
  • [7] A Review on Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes for Water Purification
    Yang, Zi
    Zhou, Yi
    Feng, Zhiyuan
    Rui, Xiaobo
    Zhang, Tong
    Zhang, Zhien
    [J]. POLYMERS, 2019, 11 (08)
  • [8] Produced water treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes
    Mondal, S.
    Wickramasinghe, S. Ranil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2008, 322 (01) : 162 - 170
  • [10] Influence of biofouling on boron removal by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes
    Huertas, Esther
    Herzberg, Moshe
    Oron, Gideon
    Elimelech, Menachem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2008, 318 (1-2) : 264 - 270