Regional Differences in Information Privacy Concerns After the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica Data Scandal

被引:5
|
作者
Gonzalez-Pizarro, Felipe [1 ,3 ]
Figueroa, Andrea [2 ]
Lopez, Claudia [1 ]
Aragon, Cecilia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecn Federico Santa Maria, Dept Informat, Santa Maria, Chile
[2] Univ Washington, Human Ctr Design & Engn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Comp Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
Online privacy; Twitter; Word embedding; Content analysis; IUIPC; CULTURE; PARADOX; WILLINGNESS; BEHAVIOR; TWITTER; MEDIA; USERS; IUIPC;
D O I
10.1007/s10606-021-09422-3
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
While there is increasing global attention to data privacy, most of their current theoretical understanding is based on research conducted in a few countries. Prior work argues that people's cultural backgrounds might shape their privacy concerns; thus, we could expect people from different world regions to conceptualize them in diverse ways. We collected and analyzed a large-scale dataset of tweets about the #CambridgeAnalytica scandal in Spanish and English to start exploring this hypothesis. We employed word embeddings and qualitative analysis to identify which information privacy concerns are present and characterize language and regional differences in emphasis on these concerns. Our results suggest that related concepts, such as regulations, can be added to current information privacy frameworks. We also observe a greater emphasis on data collection in English than in Spanish. Additionally, data from North America exhibits a narrower focus on awareness compared to other regions under study. Our results call for more diverse sources of data and nuanced analysis of data privacy concerns around the globe.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 77
页数:45
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Regional Differences in Information Privacy Concerns After the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica Data Scandal
    Felipe González-Pizarro
    Andrea Figueroa
    Claudia López
    Cecilia Aragon
    [J]. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2022, 31 : 33 - 77
  • [2] User Data Privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and Privacy Protection
    Isaak, Jim
    Hanna, Mina J.
    [J]. COMPUTER, 2018, 51 (08) : 56 - 59
  • [3] "It wouldn't happen to me": Privacy concerns and perspectives following the Cambridge Analytica scandal
    Hinds, Joanne
    Williams, Emma J.
    Joinson, Adam N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2020, 143 (143)
  • [4] "Should I Stay or Should I Leave?": Exploring (Dis)continued Facebook Use After the Cambridge Analytica Scandal
    Brown, Allison J.
    [J]. SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2020, 6 (01):
  • [5] "This is capitalism. It is not illegal": Users' attitudes toward institutional privacy following the Cambridge Analytica scandal
    Afriat, Hagar
    Dvir-Gvirsman, Shira
    Tsuriel, Keren
    Ivan, Lidor
    [J]. INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2020, 37 (02): : 115 - 127
  • [6] Regional Differences in Facebook Privacy Settings and Behaviour
    Pavlicek, Antonin
    Doucek, Petr
    Yablotschnikov, Sergei
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH CONFERENCE OF OPEN INNOVATIONS ASSOCIATION (FRUCT), 2019, : 313 - 320
  • [7] Information Privacy Concerns on Teens as Facebook Users in Indonesia
    Kusyanti, Ari
    Puspitasari, Dita Rahma
    Catherina, Harin Puspa Ayu
    Sari, Yustiyana April Lia
    [J]. 4TH INFORMATION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (ISICO 2017), 2017, 124 : 632 - 638
  • [8] Conversations with fellow leaders: Privacy framing in congressional hearings after Cambridge Analytica
    Epstein, Dmitry
    Medzini, Rotem
    [J]. TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2022, 46 (10)
  • [10] Privacy concerns could derail Facebook data-sharing plan
    Mervis, Jeffrey
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2019, 365 (6460) : 1360 - 1361