Deterministic earthquake damage and loss assessment for the city of Bucharest, Romania

被引:21
|
作者
Lang, Dominik [2 ]
Molina-Palacios, Sergio [1 ]
Lindholm, Conrad [2 ]
Balan, Stefan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alicante, Fac Sci, E-03080 Alicante, Spain
[2] NORSAR ICG, Kjeller, Norway
[3] Natl Inst Earth Phys, Bucharest, Romania
关键词
Seismic damage and loss assessment; Vulnerability assessment; Analytical approach; Logic tree computation scheme; MOTION PREDICTION EQUATIONS; INTERMEDIATE-DEPTH VRANCEA; SEISMIC-HAZARD; RISK; MAPS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s10950-011-9250-y
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
On March 4, 1977, an earthquake with a moment magnitude M (w) 7.4 at a hypocentral depth of 94 km hit the Vrancea region (Romania). In Bucharest alone, the earthquake caused severe damage to 33,000 buildings while 1,424 people were killed. Under the umbrella of the SAFER project, the city of Bucharest, being one of the larger European cities at risk, was chosen as a test bed for the estimation of damage and connected losses in case of a future large magnitude earthquake in the Vrancea area. For the conduct of these purely deterministic damage and loss computations, the open-source software SELENA is applied. In order to represent a large event in the Vrancea region, a set of deterministic scenarios were defined by combining ranges of focal parameters, i.e., magnitude, focal depth, and epicentral location. Ground motion values are computed by consideration of different ground motion prediction equations that are believed to represent earthquake attenuation effects in the region. Variations in damage and loss estimates are investigated through considering different sets of building vulnerability curves (provided by HAZUS-MH and various European authors) to characterize the damaging behavior of prevalent building typologies in the city of Bucharest.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 88
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deterministic earthquake damage and loss assessment for the city of Bucharest, Romania
    Dominik Lang
    Sergio Molina-Palacios
    Conrad Lindholm
    Stefan Balan
    [J]. Journal of Seismology, 2012, 16 : 67 - 88
  • [2] Scenario-based earthquake risk assessment for Bucharest, Romania
    Pavel, Florin
    Vacareanu, Radu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2016, 20 : 138 - 144
  • [3] Earthquake risk perception in Bucharest, Romania
    Armas, Iuliana
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2006, 26 (05) : 1223 - 1234
  • [4] Quantitative modelling of seismic site amplification in an earthquake-endangered capital city: Bucharest, Romania
    Andrei Bala
    [J]. Natural Hazards, 2014, 72 : 1429 - 1445
  • [5] Quantitative modelling of seismic site amplification in an earthquake-endangered capital city: Bucharest, Romania
    Bala, Andrei
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2014, 72 (03) : 1429 - 1445
  • [6] Earthquake damage assessment for deterministic scenarios in Iquique, Chile
    Paula Aguirre
    Jorge Vásquez
    Juan Carlos de la Llera
    Juan González
    Gabriel González
    [J]. Natural Hazards, 2018, 92 : 1433 - 1461
  • [7] Earthquake damage assessment for deterministic scenarios in Iquique, Chile
    Aguirre, Paula
    Vasquez, Jorge
    Carlos de la Llera, Juan
    Gonzalez, Juan
    Gonzalez, Gabriel
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2018, 92 (03) : 1433 - 1461
  • [8] Urban hydrogeology studies in Bucharest City, Romania
    Gogu, Constantin Radu
    Gaitanaru, Dragos
    Boukhemacha, Mohamed Amine
    Serpescu, Irina
    Litescu, Liviu
    Zaharia, Valentin
    Moldovan, Alexandru
    Mihailovici, Madalin J.
    [J]. URBAN SUBSURFACE - FROM GEOSCIENCE AND ENGINEERING TO SPATIAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 209 : 135 - 142
  • [9] Vulnerability to Earthquake Hazard: Bucharest Case Study, Romania
    Iuliana Armaş
    Dragos Toma-Danila
    Radu Ionescu
    Alexandru Gavriş
    [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2017, 8 : 182 - 195
  • [10] Vulnerability to Earthquake Hazard:Bucharest Case Study,Romania
    Iuliana Armas
    Dragos Toma-Danila
    Radu Ionescu
    Alexandru Gavris
    [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2017, 8 (02) : 182 - 195