Crustal structure of the Volgo-Uralian subcraton revealed by inverse and forward gravity modelling

被引:3
|
作者
Ognev, Igor [1 ]
Ebbing, Joerg [2 ]
Haas, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Kazan Fed Univ, Inst Geol & Petr Technol, 4-5 Kremlyovskaya St, Kazan 420008, Russia
[2] Univ Kiel, Dept Geosci, Otto Hahn Pl 1, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
关键词
EAST EUROPEAN CRATON; LITHOSPHERIC STRUCTURE; THERMAL REGIME; MOHO; DENSITY; MANTLE; ARCHITECTURE; GREENLAND; EVOLUTION; BASEMENT;
D O I
10.5194/se-13-431-2022
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Volgo-Uralia is a Neoarchaean easternmost part of the East European craton. Recent seismic studies of the Volgo-Uralian region provided new insights into the crustal structure of this area. In this study, we combine satellite gravity and seismic data in a common workflow to perform a complex study of Volgo-Uralian crustal structure, which is useful for further basin analysis of the area. In this light, a new crustal model of the Volgo-Uralian subcraton is presented from a step-wise approach: (1) inverse gravity modelling followed by (2) 3D forward gravity modelling. First, inversion of the satellite gravity gradient data was applied to determine the Moho depth for the area. Density contrasts between crust and mantle were varied laterally according to the tectonic units present in the region, and the model is constrained by the available active seismic data. The Moho discontinuity obtained from the gravity inversion was consequently modified and complemented in order to define a complete 3D crustal model by adding information on the sedimentary cover, upper crust, lower crust, and lithospheric mantle layers in the process of forward gravity modelling, where both seismic and gravity constraints were respected. The obtained model shows crustal thickness variations from 32 to more than 55 km in certain areas. The thinnest crust with a thickness below 40 km is found beneath the Precaspian basin, which is covered by a thick sedimentary layer. The thickest crust is located underneath the Ural Mountains as well as in the centre of the Volgo-Uralian subcraton. In both areas the crustal thickness exceeds 50 km. At the same time, initial forward gravity modelling has shown a gravity misfit of ca. 95 mGal between the measured Bouguer gravity anomaly and the forward calculated gravity field in the central area of the Volgo-Uralian subcraton. This misfit was interpreted and modelled as a high-density lower crust, which possibly represents underplated material. Our preferred crustal model of the Volgo-Uralian subcraton respects the gravity and seismic constraints and reflects the main geological features of the region with Moho thickening in the cratons and under the Ural Mountains and thinning along the Palaeoproterozoic rifts, Precaspian sedimentary basin, and Pre-Urals foredeep.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 448
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE USE OF "NATIVE" WAVELET TRANSFORM FOR DETERMINING LATERAL DENSITY VARIATION OF THE VOLGO-URALIAN SUBCRATON
    Ognev, I. N.
    Utemov, E., V
    Nurgaliev, D. K.
    [J]. SOCAR PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 2021 : 135 - 140
  • [2] Forward and inverse modelling of gravity revealing insight into crustal structures of the Eastern Alps
    Ebbing, J
    Braitenberg, C
    Götze, HJ
    [J]. TECTONOPHYSICS, 2001, 337 (3-4) : 191 - 208
  • [3] Inverse and 3D forward gravity modelling for the estimation of the crustal thickness of Egypt
    Sobh, Mohamed
    Ebbing, Joerg
    Mansi, Ahmed Hamdi
    Goetze, Hans-Juergen
    [J]. TECTONOPHYSICS, 2019, 752 : 52 - 67
  • [4] Robustness analysis in forward modelling gravity data in crustal/lithospheric studies
    Pohanka, Vladimir
    Vajda, Peter
    Bielik, Miroslav
    Dererova, Jana
    [J]. CONTRIBUTIONS TO GEOPHYSICS AND GEODESY, 2011, 41 (04): : 279 - 296
  • [5] Crustal structure and implications for the tectonic evolution of the Archean Western Superior craton from forward and inverse gravity modeling
    Nitescu, B
    Cruden, AR
    Bailey, RC
    [J]. TECTONICS, 2006, 25 (01)
  • [6] Crustal structure of Sicily from modelling of gravity and magnetic anomalies
    Milano, M.
    Kelemework, Y.
    La Manna, M.
    Fedi, M.
    Montanari, D.
    Iorio, M.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [7] Crustal structure of Sicily from modelling of gravity and magnetic anomalies
    M. Milano
    Y. Kelemework
    M. La Manna
    M. Fedi
    D. Montanari
    M. Iorio
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [8] Forearc Crustal Structure of Ecuador Revealed by Gravity and Aeromagnetic Anomalies and Their Geodynamic Implications
    Aizprua, Carlos
    Witt, C.
    Bronner, M.
    Johansen, S. E.
    Barba, D.
    Hernandez, M. J.
    [J]. LITHOSPHERE, 2020, 2020 (01) : 10707 - 10721
  • [9] Crustal disequilibrium of the central Pontides (northern Turkey) due to oroclinal bending revealed by gravity modelling
    Ozkaptan, Murat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2019, 186
  • [10] Crustal structure of the southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone: OBS, MCS and gravity modelling
    Wang, TK
    Lin, SF
    Liu, CS
    Wang, CS
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 157 (01) : 147 - 163